User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 18
 Downloands 3
Selected Soil Physicochemical Properties under Different Tillage Practices and N Fertilizer Application in Maize Mono-Cropping
2022
Journal:  
Agriculture
Author:  
Abstract:

: No-till (NT) has been said to conserve soil moisture, maintain or increase organic matter (OM), and improve crop production compared to conventional tillage (CT). However, very few studies have explored the effect of these under dry-land agriculture with occasional tillage where ploughing is performed only after several years of NT, especially in KwaZulu–Natal. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of tillage and fertilizer application on selected physicochemical soil properties under rain-fed maize production. Soil samples from NT, conventional tillage in the 5th season (CT-Y5), and annual conventional tillage (CT-A) with 0, 60, 120, 240 kg N ha −1 were taken at 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm and analysed for pH, EC, exchangeable acidity, exchangeable bases, C:N, gravimetric water content, bulk density, and soil texture. Results showed that NT at 0 and 60 kg N ha −1 in 0–10 cm had higher bases, gravimetric water content, pH, and EC compared CT-Y5 and CT-A ( p < 0.05). At 10–20 cm depth, CT-Y5 had higher gravimetric water content (0.17 gg −1), followed by CT-A, (0.13 g g −1), while NT had the least (0.11 g g −1) ( p < 0.05) in the control treatment. Again at 20–30 cm depth, NT had higher ( p < 0.05) bases than CT-Y5 and CT-A tillage practices at 120 and 240 kg N ha −1 application rate. Regression analysis of fertilizer application rate with both bases and gravimetric water content showed a strong relationship under NT. Better soil properties under both NT and CT-Y5 was attributed to residue cover and minimum disturbance of the soil, which encouraged infiltration, thus reducing runoff and evaporation from the soil surface. Accumulation of residue under conservation tillage enhances OM, which subsequently improves soil quality, whereas ploughing aerates the soil causing oxidation of OM, thus releasing H + ions. Again, fertilizer application induces mineralization of OM, thus, higher fertilizer application rates result in low levels of carbon. NT is well-recommended in conserving soil quality while sustaining crop productivity.

Keywords:

2022
Journal:  
Agriculture
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Agriculture

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 9.836
Cite : 6.502
2023 Impact : 0.04
Quarter
Basic Field of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Q4
65/73

Agriculture