User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 5
 Views 39
 Downloands 7
YARGI YETKİSİNİN KULLANILMASI AÇISINDAN SERİ MUHAKEME USULÜ – ANAYASANIN 138. MADDESİNE AYKIRILIK SORUNU
2021
Journal:  
Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

5271 sayılı Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununda düzenlene seri muhakeme usulü ile olağan yargılama usulünden farklı olarak cezai uyuşmazlığın sonlandırılmasında yeni bir usul getirilmiştir. Bu usuldeki belki de en önemli özellik Cumhuriyet Savcısının cezai uyuşmazlık konusunda doğrudan belirleyici konuma gelmiş olmasıdır. Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununda düzenlendiği şekliyle Cumhuriyet Savcısının uyuşmazlığın çözümüne ilişkin olarak kanaati ya da değerlendirmesi önem arz etmekle birlikte, hüküm açısından nihai bir belirleyiciliği bulunmamaktaydı. Buna karşın seri muhakemeye ilişkin düzenlemeler ile birlikte C.Savcısı mahkûmiyet hükmünün içeriğini oluşturan (sübut ve cezanın tespiti) kararı doğrudan kendisi belirlemekte mahkeme sadece şekli denetim işlevini yerine getirmektedir. Bu düzenlemenin Anayasanın yargı yetkisinin kullanılması ile ilgili hükümleri açısından incelenmesi önem arz etmektedir

Keywords:

The Plea Bargaining Procedure Regulated In The Criminal Procedure Law In Terms Of The Exercise Of Judicial Power - The Problem Of Unconstitutionality
2021
Author:  
Abstract:

The plea bargaining procedure as regulated in the Code of Criminal Procedure No. 5271, has introduced notably different procedure in terms of terminating a criminal dispute. Perhaps the most important feature of this new procedure is that the Public Prosecutor has become a direct determinant on the dispute. As regulated in the Code of Criminal Procedure, although the opinion or evaluation of the Public Prosecutor regarding the resolution of the dispute has been important, it was not determinant on the final judgment. On the other hand, according to the provisions of the plea bargaining procedure, the Public Prosecutor determines directly the decision that constitutes the content of the conviction (the facts and the determination of the sentence), and the court fulfills only the formal inspection function. This regulation, especially regarding the use of the judicial power, the, it should be evaluated against the Constitutional provisions on judiciary.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Hukuk

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 335
Cite : 1.452
2023 Impact : 0.071
Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi