Atıf Sayısı
1
Görüntüleme
7
İndirme
1
AMAÇ: Bu çalışmada sağlık alanı dışındaki akademisyen grubunun organ nakli ve bağışı hakkındaki görüşlerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Çalışmanın etik kurul onayı Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulundan (26.02.2016; 2016/07) alınmıştır. Çalışma kapsamına sağlık alanı dışındaki fakülte ve yüksekokullarda çalışan, araştırmaya katılmayı kabul eden 202 akademisyen çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Araştırmacılar tarafından literatür taranarak hazırlanan, demografik özellikler ile organ nakli ve bağışına yönelik 28 soru içeren anket formu araştırma kapsamına alınan akademisyenlere verilerek cevaplamaları istenmiştir. Sonuçlar SPSS 22.0 programında değerlendirilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde katılımcı görüşleri frekans ve yüzde dağılımları ile hesaplanmıştır. BULGULAR: Akademisyenlerin %92.6’sı organlarını bağışlamadığını ifade etmiştir. “Sonraki zamanlarda bağışlamayı düşünür müsünüz” sorusuna ise Akademisyenlerin %54’ü bilmiyorum şeklinde cevap vermiştir. Akademisyenlerin %98.5’inin beyin ölümünün tanımını bildiği görülmüştür. Akademisyenlerin %60.4’ü organ bağışının maddi çıkar karşılığında yapıldığına, %52.5’i organ bekleme listelerinde yanlılık olduğuna ve %81.2’si de yasa dışı organ ticareti yapıldığına inandıklarını ifade etmiştir. Akademisyenlerin %44.6’sı ülkemizdeki organ bağış oranlarının düşüklüğünü birinci sırada dinen caiz olmadığı düşüncesine bağlamıştır.
In this study, it was intended to determine the opinions of the academic group without health origins, about organ transplantation and donation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ethics committee approval of the study was taken from the Turkish Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee (26.02.2016; 2016/07). 202 academics who were not on leave, who accepted to participate in the study and who worked in faculties and colleges except the field of health were taken into the scope of the study. Questionnaire method was used in the research. The questionnaire prepared by researchers searching the literature containing 28 questions about organ transplantation and donation were given to the academics who were taken into the scope of the research and they were asked to complete it. The results were evaluated with SPSS 22.0 package software. Results: 92.6% of the academics expressed that they did not donate their organs. 54% of the academics answered the question "Do you think to donate your organs later?" As “I do not know”. It was seen that 98.5 percent of the academics knew the definition of cerebral death. 60.4 % of the academics expressed that organ donation was made for a consideration, 52.5 % of them expressed that there was bias in the organ waiting lists and 81. 2% of them expressed that they believed that there was illegal organ trade. 44.6% of the academics answered that the reason was the thought about its religiously not being permissible. Conclusions: It can be said that the organ donation rate of the academics is low, they are indecisive about donation in the future and they have wrong opinions about organ distribution. They think that the low rate of organ donations is because of the thought about its being religiously not allowable.
ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE: In this study, it was intended to determine the opinions of the academic group without health origins, about organ transplantation and donation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ethics committee approval of the study was taken from the Turkish Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee (26.02.2016; 2016/07). 202 academics who were not on leave, who accepted to participate in the study and who worked in faculties and colleges except the field of health were taken into the scope of the study. Questionnaire method was used in the research. Questionnaire prepared by researchers searching the literature containing 28 questions about organ transplantation and donation were given to the academics who were taken into the scope of the research and they were asked to complete it. The results were evaluated with SPSS 22,0 package software. RESULTS: 92.6 % of the academics expressed that they did not donate their organs. 54 % of the academics answered the question ‘’Do you think to donate your organs later?’’ as ‘’I do not know’’. It was seen that 98.5 % of the academics knew the definition of cerebral death. 60.4 % of the academics expressed that organ donation was made for a consideration, 52.5 % of them expressed that there was bias in the organ waiting lists and 81.2 % of them expressed that they believed that there was illegal organ trade. 44.6 % of the academics answered that the reason was the thought about its religiously not being allowable. CONCLUSIONS: It can be said that the organ donation rate of the academics is low, they are indecisive about donation in the future and they have wrong opinions about organ distribution. They think that the low rate of organ donations is because of the thought about its being religiously not allowable.
Alan : Sağlık Bilimleri
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Makale Detay 
Atıf Yapanlar
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
