User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and Type2 (NF1 and NF2): Molecular Genetic Profiles of the Patients
2023
Journal:  
Acta Oncologica Turcica
Author:  
Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Neurofibromatosis type I and type 2 (NF1 and NF2) are two rare autosomal dominant neurocutaneous genetic disorders that are diagnosed based on clinical diagnostic criteria of the National Institutes of Health Consensus. Due to increased malignancy risks and age-related penetrance, NGS-based diagnosis methods should be used for early diagnosis. However, molecular diagnosis of the NF1 and NF2 genes are challenging owing to the large size of genes, and the lack of mutation hotspots. In this study, we present 67 patients between 2016-2019 who were investigated for NF1 and NF2 genes with the next generation sequencing (NGS). We aimed to show the effectiveness of NGS-based molecular genetic diagnoses and contribute to establishing the variant spectrum in the Turkish population. METHODS: Patients who met the diagnostic criteria were included in this study. After DNA extraction from peripheric blood samples, an NGS-based panel that includes both NF1 and NF2 genes was performed. Results were evaluated using ACMG 2015 criteria and in silico bioinformatics tools. RESULTS: 39 of 67 total patients revealed various variants (39/67, ~%58). The variant distribution was as follows; 15 frameshift, 8 nonsense, 7 missense, 6 splice sites, and three insertion/deletion. Novel variants ratio was 23/39 (22 NF1, 1 NF2, ~%59). The classification according to clinical significance was as follows: 23 pathogenic, 14 likely pathogenic, and one VUS according to ACMG 2015 criteria. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that a genetic screening using an NGS panel is more useful and helpful to provide early diagnosis and genetic counseling and have a positive impact on patient follow-up.

Keywords:

0
2023
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Acta Oncologica Turcica

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 648
Cite : 88
Acta Oncologica Turcica