Views
40
Downloands
5
Bu çalışmada Türkiye’deki 22 bankanın 2009-2018 yılları arası finansal performanslarının, bulanık çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinin α-kesim düzeylerine göre değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Ayrıca Copeland yöntemiyle bütünleştirme işlemi yapılarak, bulanık çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinin hangi α-kesim düzeyi sonucunun öne çıktığının belirlenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Uygulamada 26 adet kriter kullanılmıştır. Kullanılan kriterlerin ağırlıkları bulanık Shannon Entropi yöntemiyle α=0,1, α=0,3, α=0,5 α=0,7 ve α=0,9 kesim aralıklarına göre hesaplanmıştır. Bulanık Topsis ve Bulanık Vikor yöntemleriyle performans analizi yapılmıştır. Yöntemler ve Copeland yöntemi sıralamaları arasındaki ilişki Spearman sıra korelasyon testi yapılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Copeland yöntemi, Bulanık Topsis ve Bulanık Vikor yöntemlerinin sıralama sonuçları karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmiştir.
This study aims to evaluate the financial performance of 22 banks in Turkey between 2009-2018, the foolish multi-critical decision-making methods according to a-cutting levels. In addition, the integration process with the Copeland method is aimed at determining which a-cutting level result is highlighted by the foolish multi-critical decision-making methods. There are 26 criteria used in the application. The weights of the criteria used are calculated by the modest Shannon Entropi method by α=0.1, α=0.3, α=0.5 α=0.7 and α=0.9 cutting intervals. The performance analysis was performed by the Bully Topsis and Bully Vikor methods. The relationship between the methods and Copeland method rankings was assessed by performing the Spearman line correlation test. The Copeland method was evaluated by comparing the ranking results of the Copeland Topsis and Copeland Vikor methods.
In this study; It is aimed to evaluate the financial performances of 22 banks in Turkey between the years 2009-2018 according to the α-levels of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods. In addition, it is aimed to determine which α-intercept level result of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods comes to the fore by integrating with the Copeland method. 26 criteria were used in the application. The weights of the criteria used were calculated using the fuzzy Shannon Entropy method according to the cut-off intervals of α=0.1, α=0.3, α=0.5, α=0.7 and α=0.9. Performance analysis was made with Fuzzy Topsis and Fuzzy Vikor methods. The relationship between the methods and Copeland method rankings was evaluated by using the Spearman rank correlation test. The ranking results of the Copeland method, Fuzzy Topsis and Fuzzy Vikor methods were compared and evaluated.
Field : Eğitim Bilimleri; Filoloji; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Journal Type : Uluslararası
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
