Citation Number
7
Views
14
Downloands
3
Amaç: Çalışma, yoğun bakım ünitesinde tedavi gören hastaların algıladıkları çevresel stresör düzeyinin uyku kalitesine etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla gerçekleştirildi. Materyal ve Metot: Tanımlayıcı, kesitsel ve ilişki arayıcı tasarımda yapılan araştırmanın örneklemini, bir kamu hastanesinin ikinci basamak genel yoğun bakım ünitesinde yatan 270 hasta oluşturdu. Araştırmanın verileri, "Hasta Onam Formu", "Hasta Tanıtım Formu", "Pittsburg Uyku Kalitesi Ölçeği (PUKİ)" ve "Yoğun Bakım Ünitesi Çevresel Stresörler Ölçeği (YBÜÇSÖ)" kullanılarak toplandı. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde, studen t testi, Tek Yönlü ANOVA, Tukey HSD Post-hoc testi, Spearmen Korelasyon Analizi, Kruskal Wallis testi ve Mann Whitney U testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların PUKİ ölçek toplam puan ortalaması 15,01±2,69 ve YBÜÇSÖ toplam puan ortalaması 128,32±16,37 olarak saptandı. Hastaların çevresel stresör düzeyi ile öznel uyku kalitesi alt boyut toplam puanları arasında pozitif yönlü zayıf ilişki bulundu (p p<0.05). Hastaların çevresel stresör düzeyi arttıkça uyku latansı alt boyut toplam puanları da artmakta (r:0,163) uyku süresi alt boyut toplam puanları azalmakta (r:0,154) ve gündüz işlev bozukluğu süresi alt boyut toplam puanları artmakta (r:0,461) idi. Sonuç: Hastaların uyku kalitesi kötü ve çevresel stresörlerden etkileme düzeyleri orta seviyededir. Hastaların çevresel stresör düzeyi arttıkça uyku kalitesi olumsuz yönde etkilenmektedir.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of perceived environmental stressors on sleep quality of patients treated in the intensive care unit. Materials and Methods: The sampling of this descriptive, cross-sectional and relative design study was 270 patients who were hospitalized in a second line general intensive care unit of a public hospital. Data were collected using "Patient Consent Form", "Patient Identification Form", "Pittsburg Sleep Quality Scale (PSQI)" and "Intensive Care Unit Environmental Stressors Scale (ICUESS)". Independent Sample t test, One Way ANOVA, Tukey HSD Post-hoc test, Spearmen Correlation Analysis, Kruskal Wallis Test, Mann Whitney U test were used to evaluate the data. Results: Mean PSQI total score of the participants was 15.01 ± 2. 69, and sleep quality was poor. The average total score ICUESS was 128.32 ± 16.37. A weak positive correlation was found between environmental stressor level and subjective sleep quality subscale total scores (p<0.05). As the environmental stressor level of the patients increased, sleep latency subscale total scores increased (r:0.163). As the environmental stressor level of the patients increased, total subscale scores of sleep duration decreased (r:0.154). As the environmental stressor level of the patients increased, the subscale total scores of the duration of day time dysfunction also increased (r:0.461). Conclusions: The sleep quality of the patients is poor and the level of influence from environmental stressors is moderate. As the environmental stressor level of the patients increases, sleep quality is negatively affected.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of perceived environmental stressors on sleep quality of patients treated in the intensive care unit. Materials and Methods: The sampling of this descriptive, cross-sectional and relational design study was 270 patients who were hospitalized in a second line general intensive care unit of a public hospital. Data were collected using "Patient Consent Form", "Patient Identification Form", "Pittsburg Sleep Quality Scale (PSQI)" and "Intensive Care Unit Environmental Stressors Scale (ICUESS)". Independent Sample t test, One Way ANOVA, Tukey HSD Post-hoc test, Spearmen Correlation Analysis, Kruskal Wallis Test, Mann Whitney U test were used to evaluate the data. Results: Mean PSQI total score of the participants was 15.01 ± 2.69, and sleep quality was poor. The mean total score ICUESS was 128.32 ± 16.37. A weak positive correlation was found between environmental stressor level and subjective sleep quality subscale total scores (p<0.05). As the environmental stressor level of the patients increased, sleep latency subscale total scores increased (r:0.163). As the environmental stressor level of the patients increased, total subscale scores of sleep duration decreased (r:0.154). As the environmental stressor level of the patients increased, the subscale total scores of the duration of day time dysfunction also increased (r:0.461). Conclusions: The sleep quality of the patients is poor and the level of influence from environmental stressors is moderate. As the environmental stressor level of the patients increases, sleep quality is negatively affected.
Journal Type : Uluslararası
Article Detail 
Citation Owners
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
