User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 2
 Views 70
 Downloands 48
Toplumsal Olaylara Dair Episodik ve Semantik Bellek Süreçlerinin Heyecanlanma Düzeyi ile İlişkisinin Yaş ve Heyecanın Ölçüm Türü Açısından İncelenmesi
2020
Journal:  
Psikoloji Çalışmaları
Author:  
Abstract:

Araştırmanın temel amacı toplumsal olaylara dair episodik (EB) ve semantik bellek (SB) süreçleri ile heyecanlanma arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bu ilişkinin yaş grupları arasında farklılıklar gösterip göstermediğini, öz-değerlendirmelere dayanan heyecanlanma ile fizyolojik ölçümlerle saptanan heyecanlanma düzeyi arasındaki tutarlılığı ve olayların fenomonolojik özelliklerini bellek türüne ve heyecanlanma düzeyine göre incelemektir. Bu amaçla, 18-25 yaş arası 32 genç yetişkin bireyden (Ort. = 20.60, SS = 2.22), 40-55 yaş arası 33 orta yaş yetişkin bireyden (Ort. = 47.32, SS = 6.60) ve 60-75 yaş arası 30 yaşlı bireylerden (Ort. = 69.97, SS = 6.16) veri toplanmıştır. Katılımcılardan kendilerine sunulan 10 adet toplumsal olay için hatırlama/bilme değerlendirmesi yapmaları istenmiştir. Sonrasında hem sunulan olayın içeriğine ilişkin (SB) hem de olayı haber alma bağlamının hatırlanmasına ilişkin (EB) soruları cevaplamışlardır. Son olarak, hatırlama sırasındaki heyecan düzeylerini belirtmiş ve olayları önem, duygusal yük ve yoğunluk gibi fenomonolojik özellikler açısından değerlendirmişlerdir. Heyecanlanma düzeyi GSR (Galvanic skin response) cihazı ile fizyolojik ölçümler yapılarak da değerlendirilmiştir. Öz-bildirime dayalı heyecanlanma düzeyinin SB süreçlerine kıyasla EB için yüksek olduğu gözlemlenirken, heyecanlanmanın beş fizyolojik gösterge için farklı örüntüler gösterdiği bulunmuştur. Heyecanlanma düzeyi arttıkça EB ve SB performansları da artmış ve genç bireyler diğer iki yaş grubuna kıyasla daha yüksek heyecanlanma seviyesi ve daha hızlı fizyolojik tepki göstermişlerdir. Fenomonolojik özellikler incelendiğinde ise hatırlanan olaylar, bilinenlere kıyasla daha önemli, duygusal olarak da daha yoğun ve olumsuz olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca, heyecanlanma düzeyi arttıkça olayın öneminin, duygu yoğunluğunun ve olumsuzluk derecesinin arttığı görülmüştür. Bulgulara ek olarak, öz-bildirimlerin güvenilirliği ve objektif ölçümlerin önemi tartışılmıştır. Son olarak, bu çalışmadaki bulgular ve sınırlılıklar göz önünde bulundurularak gelecek araştırmalar için öneriler sunulmuştur.

Keywords:

Episodic and semantic memory processes for social events Relationship with the level of excitement and the type of age and excitement measurement
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

The main objectives of the study were to investigate (1) the potential differences in arousal levels for episodic (EM) and semantic (SM) processes regarding public events and the comparison of these differences for different age groups, (2) the consistency of self-report versus objective measures of arousal, and (3) phenomenological characteristics of the events as function of memory type and arousal level. The sample consisted of 32 young adults whose ages ranged between 18 and 25 years (M = 20.60, SD = 2.22), 33 middle-aged adults aged between 40 and 55 years (M = 47.32, SD = 6.60), and 30 elderly people aged between 60 and 75 years (M = 69.97, SD = 6.16). Participants were asked to make a memory/know judgment for the 10 public events presented to them. They further answered event-related questions (SM) and questions regarding the context of hearing about the event (EM). Moreover, they their arousal level during recall and evaluated each event in terms of phenomenological characteristics such as importance, emotional intensity, and valence. Arousal level was also measured using physiological measurements with the GSR device. Based on self-reports, EM processes were associated with higher arousal levels compared to SM processes whereas the five physiological indicators of arousal displayed different patterns. Both EM and SM performance displayed an increase together with the increasing arousal levels, and young participants displayed higher levels of arousal and faster physiological responses than both middle-aged and elderly adults. When phenomenological characteristics were examined, remembered public events were rated more important, emotionally more intense and more negative than known events. Furthermore, higher arousal levels were associated with higher ratings of emotional intensity, importance and negativity. The reliability of self-reports and the critical role of applying objective measures were discussed together with the findings. Finally, some suggestions were proposed for future research on the basis of the current limitations and results.

Keywords:

Episodic and Semantic Memory Processes Regarding Public Events and Their Relationship With Arousal Level, Age and Measurement Type
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

The major aims of the study were to investigate (1) the potential differences in arousal levels for episodic (EM) and semantic memory (SM) processes regarding public events and the comparison of these differences for different age groups, (2) the consistency of self-report versus objective measures of arousal, and (3) phenomenological characteristics of the events as function of memory type and arousal level. The sample consisted of 32 young adults whose ages ranged between 18 and 25 years (M= 20.60, SD = 2.22), 33 middle-aged adults aged between 40 and 55 years (M = 47.32, SD = 6.60), and 30 elderly people aged between 60 and 75 years (M = 69.97, SD = 6.16). Participants were asked to make a remember/know judgment for the 10 public events presented to them. They further answered event-related questions (SM) and questions regarding the context of hearing about the event (EM). Moreover, they reported their arousal level during recall and evaluated each event in terms of phenomenological characteristics such as importance, emotional intensity, and valence. Arousal level was also measured using physiological measurements with the GSR device. Based on self-reports, EM processes were associated with higher arousal levels compared to SM processes whereas the five physiological indicators of arousal displayed different patterns. Both EM and SM performance displayed an increase together with the increasing arousal levels, and young participants displayed higher levels of arousal and faster physiological responses than both middle-aged and elderly adults. When phenomenological characteristics were examined, remembered public events were rated more important, emotionally more intense and more negative than known events. Furthermore, higher arousal levels were associated with higher ratings of emotional intensity, importance and negativity. The reliability of self-reports and the critical role of applying objective measures were discussed together with the findings. Finally, some suggestions were proposed for future research on the basis of the current limitations and results.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Psikoloji Çalışmaları

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 262
Cite : 1.099
Psikoloji Çalışmaları