Özet:

The mosque, which is the main place of worship of Muslims, has been shaped in time according to the needs and changes in the framework of conditions and possibilities and has been married according to the technology of the day from an architectural perspective. But after 17th century, this approach has not continued. Thus, despite the development of the possibilities, 17.yy. The statue of the judge is the statue of the judge today. There are many mosques that try not to get away from this image, and there are many mosques that try to use the possibilities of time and use by interpreting the elements that are becoming unlikely in time. The 17th. The mosquitoes trying to separate from the image of the mosquito and also give the image of the mosquito are facing us in many parts of the world.

The traditional mosque architecture, which has been included in the community memory of the mosque designs emerging with the new approach, on the one hand forms the infrastructure for the study of existing examples made with the new approach. This study aims to enrich this substructure by studying the nature of the use of the components of importance in the traditional mosque architecture in modern mosques.

To this goal, the study has two different readings of the Islamic religion and 17th century. It was based on the Sultan Ahmet Cami of Istanbul and Isfahan Mescid-i Imam from the countries of Turkey and Iran, which have an important influence on the mosque architecture. In these two countries, the new approaches arise in the search for the form that fits the conditions of the day in the mosque architecture, the elements and features in the mosque's exterior appearance, the spaces in the mosque, the elements and equipment in the mosque Under the headlines, It was first compared with the country’s traditional mosque sample and then compared by the sample presented from two countries.

While the same approach has not appeared to us in all the elements of a mosque, the contemporary mosque components have encountered different approaches, such as the repetition of the tradition, the interpretation of the tradition, the completely disappearance of the tradition and the addition of something new to the tradition. In addition, the two countries have noted the reflection of climate, cultural and religious differences in the traditional or contemporary mosque examples in the mosque architecture.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Özet:

The mosque, which is the main place of worship of Muslims, is evolved according to the technology of the day in an architectural sense and formed in line with the needs and changes within the framework of the conditions and opportunities. However, after the 17^th century, this approach did not continue. Today, despite the development of the possibilities, the 17^th century’s mosque style constitutes the image of the prevailing mosques. Beside a large number of mosques trying to stick to this image, there are also mosques that try to use today’s possibilities and interpret or even remove the elements that have become indispensable over time. Nowadays in many parts of the world, we can find several mosques that try to give up the image of 17^th century mosques yet trying to specify the building is a mosque.

This study is based on the Sultan Ahmet Mosque in Istanbul, Turkey and Imam Mosque in Isfahan, Iran as examples that had effective role in the mosque architecture of 17^th century. In these two countries, the new approaches that emerged in the search for a suitable form for the contemporary mosque architecture, the elements, and features of the exterior of the mosque, the elements and items in the mosque and the places in the mosque were comparatively investigated through provided examples. The reflection of climatic, cultural, and sectarian differences of the two countries, in both traditional and contemporary examples, on the mosque architecture was observed.

Anahtar Kelimeler: