User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 1
 Views 11
 Downloands 1
MİYOFASİYAL AĞRI SENDROMUNDA TETİK NOKTA ENJEKSİYONU İLE TETİK NOKTA ENJEKSİYONU BERABERİNDE KİNEZYO BANTLAMANIN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI The Comparison of The Effectiveness of Only Trigger Point Injection and Trigger Point Injection Plus Kinesio Taping in Myofascial Pain Syndrome
2021
Journal:  
Bozok Tıp Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

ÖZET Amaç: Miyofasiyal ağrı sendromunun (MAS) altında yatan periferik ve merkezi nöral mekanizmalarının kompleks patolojisi nedeniyle, kronik dönemdeki tedavisinde zorluklar yaşanmaktadır. MAS'da en yaygın kullanılan tedavi yöntemi olan tetik nokta enjeksiyonu (TNE) belli bir düzeyde ağrı gidermesine rağmen, bu etki kısa sürmektedir. Trapezius kasında MAS tedavisinde kinezyo bantlamanın (KB) faydalı etkisi olduğunu destekleyen birtakım çalışmalar bulunmaktadır. MAS tedavisine multidisipliner bir yaklaşımın daha yararlı olabileceği düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, trapezius kasında MAS tedavisinde tek başına TNE'nin ve TNE ile KB kombinasyonunun etkinliğini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: MAS olan 40 hasta rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı (grup başına 20 hasta): Grup 1: TNE (1 ml betametazon dipropionat+3 ml lidokain+1 ml salin) Grup 2: TNE beraberinde KB. Başlangıçta ve tedaviden 1-3 ay sonra görsel analog skala (GAS) ve boyun sakatlık indeksi (BSİ) kaydedildi. Bulgular: Grup 1 ve Grup 2'de hastaların yaş ortalaması sırasıyla 45.9±12.49 ve 47.0±14.34 idi. Her iki grupta da 1. ve 3. aylardaki GAS ve BSİ skorları başlangıç değerine göre anlamlı olarak azalmasına rağmen 3. ayda GAS ve BSİ skorları Grup 2'de Grup 1'e kıyasla anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü (p<0.05). Sonuç: Son zamanlarda, MAS'ın yönetimi için en yaygın kabul gören strateji altta yatan etiyolojiyi tedavi et- mektir. Ana neden tedavi edilmezse tetik noktalar yeniden aktifleşebilir ve MAS kronik hale gelebilir. Tedavi- ye multidisipliner bir yaklaşım en yararlı seçenek gibi görünmektedir. TNE beraberinde KB, MAS tedavisinde nüks ve kronikleşmenin önlenmesi için alternatif bir tedavi yaklaşımı olarak düşünülebilir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Miyofasiyal Ağrı Sendromu Tetik Nokta Enjeksiyonu Kinezyo Bantlama ABSTRACT Objective: The complex pathology of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) with its underlying central and perip- heral neural mechanisms may contribute to the difficulty in treating MPS, particularly in the chronic setting. Even if a certain level of pain relief is achieved after the trigger point injection (TPI), which is the most widely used treatment method, in MPS, this effect persists for a short time and a few treatment sessions are gene- rally required. Hence, a multidisciplinary approach to treatment seems to be most useful. Moreover, a few studies are supporting the efficacy of kinesio taping (KT) for MPS in the trapezius muscle. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of only TPI and the combination of TPI with KT on the trapezius muscle in the treatment of MPS. Material and Methods: Fourty patients with MPS were randomly divided into two groups (20 patients per group): Group 1: only TPI (1 ml of 20 mg betamethasone dipropionate combined with 3 ml of 2% lidocaine and 1 ml of saline solution) Group 2: TPI plus KT. Visual analog scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) were recorded at baseline and 1, 3 months post-treatment. Results: The mean age of patients was 45.9±12.49 and 47.0±14.34 years in Group 1 and Group 2, respec- tively. VAS and NDI scores in 1 and 3 months significantly decreased in both groups compared to baseline (p<0.05). However, the VAS and NDI scores at 3 months were significantly lower in Group 2 versus Group 1 (p<0.05). Conclusion: Recently, the most extensively admitted strategy for the management of MPS is to treat the underlying etiology. Trigger points might reactivate and MPS might sustain if the main cause is not treated. A multidisciplinary approach to treatment appears to be most beneficial. TPI plus KT may be considered as an alternative treatment approach for the prevention of recurrences and chronicity in the treatment of MPS. Keywords: Myofascial Pain Syndrome Trigger Point Injection Kinesio Taping

Keywords:

MİYOFASİYAL AĞRI SENDROMUNDA TETİK NOKTA ENJEKSİYONU İLE TETİK NOKTA ENJEKSİYONU BERABERİNDE KİNEZYO BANTLAMANIN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI The Comparison of The Effectiveness of Only Trigger Point Injection and Trigger Point Injection Plus Kinesio Taping in Myofascial Pain Syndrome
2021
Journal:  
Bozok Tıp Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Due to the complex pathology of the peripheral and central nervous mechanisms under the myopathic pain syndrome (MAS), difficulties in the treatment in the chronic period occur. The most commonly used method of treatment in the MAS is the injection of the touch point (TNE), although it relieves pain at a certain level, this effect lasts short. There are a number of studies that support the beneficial effect of kinesium bandage (KB) in the treatment of MAS in the muscle of trapezius. It is believed that a multidisciplinary approach to MAS treatment could be more useful. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of TNE and TNE and KB combination alone in the treatment of MAS in the trapezius muscle. Factors and Methods: 40 patients with MAS were randomly divided into two groups (20 patients per group): Group 1: TNE (1 ml betametazone dipropionat + 3 ml lidocaine + 1 ml salin); Group 2: TNE with KB. At the beginning and 1-3 months after treatment, the visual analog scale (GAS) and neck disability index (BSI) were recorded. The average age of patients in Group 1 and Group 2 was 45.9±12.49 and 47.0±14.34 respectively. Although the GAS and BSI scores in both groups in the 1st and 3rd months significantly decreased compared to the initial value, the GAS and BSI scores in the 3rd month were significantly lower compared to the Group 1 in Group 2 (p<0.05). Result: Recently, the most widely accepted strategy for the management of MAS is to treat the underlying ethology. If the main reason is not treated, the trigger points can be reactivated and MAS can become chronic. A multidisciplinary approach to treatment seems to be the most useful option. With TNE, KB can be considered as an alternative treatment approach to prevention of nuts and chronicalization in MAS treatment. The complex pathology of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) with its underlying central and perip-heral neural mechanisms may contribute to the difficulty in treating MPS, in the chronic setting. Even if a certain level of pain relief is achieved after the trigger point injection (TPI), which is the most widely used treatment method, in MPS, this effect persists for a short time and a few treatment sessions are gen-rally required. Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach to treatment seems to be most useful. Moreover, a few studies are supporting the effectiveness of kinesio taping (KT) for MPS in the trapezius muscle. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of only TPI and the combination of TPI with KT on the trapezius muscle in the treatment of MPS. Material and Methods: Fourty patients with MPS were randomly divided into two groups (20 patients per group): Group 1: only TPI (1 ml of 20 mg betamethasone dipropionate combined with 3 ml of 2% lidocaine and 1 ml of saline solution); Group 2: TPI plus KT. Visual analog scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) were recorded at baseline and 1, 3 months post-treatment. Results: The average age of patients was 45.9±12.49 and 47.0±14.34 years in Group 1 and Group 2, respec- tively. VAS and NDI scores in 1 and 3 months significantly decreased in both groups compared to baseline (p<0.05). However, the VAS and NDI scores at 3 months were significantly lower in Group 2 versus Group 1 (p<0.05). Conclusion: Recently, the most extensively admitted strategy for the management of MPS is to treat the underlying etiology. Trigger points might reactivate and MPS might sustain if the main cause is not treated. A multidisciplinary approach to treatment appears to be most beneficial. TPI plus KT may be considered as an alternative treatment approach for the prevention of recurrence and chronicity in the treatment of MPS. Keywords: Myofascial Pain Syndrome; Trigger Point Injection; Kinesio Taping

Keywords:

0
2021
Journal:  
Bozok Tıp Dergisi
Author:  
Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










Bozok Tıp Dergisi

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 691
Cite : 370
Bozok Tıp Dergisi