User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 24
 Downloands 1
Majority vote decision fusion system to assist automated identification of vertebral column pathologies
2023
Journal:  
Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

This paper presents a majority vote decision fusion system called AIVCP (Automated Identification of Vertebral Column Pathologies). With this aim, we proposed a three-step decision fusion algorithm: In the first step, a pool of algorithms from different groups is obtained and the number of classifiers is decreased to 10 with the use of prediction accuracy and classifier diversity concept. As a second step, different majority vote combinations of 10 algorithms are searched with a grid search strategy guided on top of 10-fold cross validation evaluation and with prediction error analysis. In the second step, we obtained four base classifiers, i.e., Naïve Bayes (NB), Simple Logistics (SL), Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ) and Decision Stump (DS) whose majority vote decision fusion generate the most accurate diagnosis rate in Vertebral Column Pathologies domain. As the third step, we applied a Support Vector Machine based feature selection to increase prediction performance of the proposed system further. The experiments are evaluated with the use of 10-fold cross-validation, Sensitivity, Specificity and Confusion Matrices. The experimental results have shown that NB, SL, LVQ, and DS as single classifiers generate 82.58%, 87.09%, 82.90%, and 77.41% average diagnosis accuracies respectively. On the other hand, majority vote decision fusion of these single predictors produces 90.32% accuracy that is higher than each of the constituents. The resultant diagnosis accuracy of Vote algorithm for Vertebral column pathologies is quite promising.

Keywords:

0
2023
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi

Field :   Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik; Mühendislik

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 762
Cite : 741
2023 Impact : 0.029
Quarter
Basic Field of Science and Mathematics
Q4
114/135

Basic Field of Engineering
Q4
103/114

Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi