Özet:

Target: Staphylococcus infections are one of the infections that are increasingly common in society and hospitals, which are important in terms of mortality and morbidity. They are in the first place among nozocomial infections and the spread of methysillin resistance in hospitals causes serious difficulties in treatment. This study aimed at identifying the sensitivities of staphylococcus from hospitals and community sources and contributing to the treatment schemes in our hospital. Method: This study included 210 Stafilococcus aureus juices, isolated from samples from various clinics. The sensitivity to various antimicrobial substances of all substances was studied by the agar disk diffusion method. Antimicrobial sensitivities were interpreted according to the NCCLS standards. Results: There was no resistance to vancomycin and tiroplanine in all the clothes. In MRSA and MSSA juices, a low resistance for fusic acid was identified by 8.2-1.9% and 6.9% for TMP/SMX, respectively. Our MRSA studies found a resistance of 100% to penicillin, 83.4 percent to gentamine, 82.5 percent to siprofloksase, 75.2 percent to levofloksase, 72.4 percent to clindamine, 71.5 percent to erythromy and 61.4 percent to ridampy. Antimicrobial resistance in this group was found in MSSA juices at 65.3 percent of penicillin, 21.7 percent of gentamine and siprofloxase, 19.8 percent of erythromy, 16.8 percent of rifampy, 11.8 percent of levofloxase and 11.8 percent of clindamine. Muporicine used in hospital-based MRSA eradication preserves its importance as it has a 3.6% resistance in MRSA wheels, without any resistance in MSSA wheels. The result: Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methyline and Staphylococcus aureus sensitive to methyline have not found resistance to vancomycin or thyroplane. Society-based MRSA and hospital-based MRSA’s siprofloksacin, levofloksacin, clindamisin, gentamisin resistance has increased. The prevalence of MRSA and MSSA and the antimicrobial resistance profile should be closer monitored.

Anahtar Kelimeler: