Atıf Sayısı
1
Görüntüleme
57
İndirme
3
Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi iktidarları boyunca en çok tartışılan kavramlardan biri de Türk milliyetçiliği olmuştur. Özellikle Kürt açılımı süreci ve öncesinde Türk milliyetçiliğine mesafeli bir tutum sergileyen iktidar partisi ve elitleri, 15 Temmuz darbe girişiminin ardından Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi ile devletin bekası temelli bir “cumhur ittifakı” kurmuştur. Her ne kadar çeşitli siyasi çevrelerde bu sürecin Türk milliyetçiliğine bir kaldıraç etkisi yaptığı tartışmalarına yol açmışsa da Türk milliyetçiliğinin daha İslamileşmesine sebep olduğu düşünülebilir. Nitekim bu ittifak giderek Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi’nin ideolojisini İslami-milliyetçi bir tandansa oturtmuş ve bu ideolojiyi hegemonikleştirmiştir. Bu sürecin ardından Türk milliyetçiliğinin siyasi temsilciliği ikiye bölünmüş ve muhalif milliyetçilerin kurduğu İyi Parti, girdiği seçimlerde selefi kadar oy almayı başarabilmiştir. Bu siyasi göstergelerin yanı sıra özellikle 15 Temmuz darbe girişiminin ardından popüler kültürde ve toplumsal muhalefetin eylem pratiklerinde Türkçü-Atatürkçü karakter ön plana çıkmaktadır. Farklı toplumsal kesimler tarafından sergilenen, Türklüğün Orta Asya mitlerine yaslanan ve Atatürk’ü simgesel bir değer olarak yeniden ön plana çıkaran bu muhalefet pratiklerinin değerlendirilmesi, hegemonik ideolojinin dönüştüğü son yıllarda bir popüler ideoloji olarak Türk milliyetçiliğinin muhalefet olanaklarının soruşturulmasını gerekli kılmıştır. Bu muhalefetin ana dayanaklarından biri olarak Atatürk imgesi ve Kemalizm’in yeni yorumlarının da değerlendirmeye dahil edilmesi elzem görülmüştür. Bu yolla, resmi ideoloji kavramına ve onun 21. yüzyıldaki toplumsal yansımalarına ilişkin yeni açılımlar getirilmesinin mümkün olabileceği düşünülmektedir.
One of the most controversial concepts during the power of the Justice and Development Party was Turkish nationalism. Specifically during the Kurdish opening process and before the Turkish nationalism, the power party and its elites, which showed a distant attitude to Turkish nationalism, after the 15th July coup attempt, the Nationalist Movement Party and the state established a "cultural alliance" based on the backdrop. Although in various political circles this process has led to discussions that have a lifting effect on Turkish nationalism, it can be thought that it has led to further Islamization of Turkish nationalism. Indeed, this alliance has increasingly set the ideology of the Justice and Development Party into an Islamic-nationalist tone and hegemonyed this ideology. After this process, the political representation of Turkish nationalism was divided into two, and the Good Party, which was established by the opposition nationalists, managed to vote as much as its predecessor in the elections it entered. In addition to these political indicators, the Turkish-Atatürkic character comes to the forefront in popular culture and the practices of social opposition, especially after the July 15 coup attempt. The evaluation of these opposition practices presented by different social sections, based on the myths of Turkey in Central Asia and re-leading Atatürk as a symbolic value, has made it necessary to investigate the opposition possibilities of Turkish nationalism as a popular ideology in recent years when the hegemonic ideology has turned into. As one of the main bases of this opposition, it has been seen that the image of Atatürk and the new comments of Kemalism are also included in the evaluation. In this way, it is believed that it could be possible to bring new opening into the concept of official ideology and its social reflections in the 21st century.
One of the most debated concepts during the Justice and Development Party governments was Turkish nationalism. The ruling party and its elites, which took a distant attitude towards Turkish nationalism before and during the Kurdish opening process, formed a “republic alliance temelli based on the survival of the state after the July 15 coup attempt. Although it has led to discussions in various political circles that this alliance has had a leverage effect on Turkish nationalism, it can be thought that Turkish nationalism has been further Islamized. As a matter of fact, this alliance made the ideology of the Justice and Development Party an Islamic-nationalist tendency and hegemonicized it in the social sphere. Following this process, the political representation of Turkish nationalism was divided into two and the the opposition nationalists’ İyi (Good) Party, managed to get as many votes as its predecessor in the elections it entered. In addition to these political indicators, especially after the coup attempt of July 15, Turkist and Kemalist characteristic come into prominence in popular culture and social opposition's action practices. The evaluation of these opposition practices exhibited by different social groups, leaning on the myths of Turkish Central Asia and re-emphasizing Atatürk as a symbolic value, made it necessary to investigate the possibilities of opposition of Turkish nationalism as a popular ideology in the recent years when hegemonic ideology was transformed. As one of the main pillars of this opposition, the image of Atatürk and the new interpretations of Kemalism should be included in the evaluation. In this way, it is possible to introduce new expansions about the concept of official ideology and its social reflections in the 21st century.
Alan : Eğitim Bilimleri; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Makale Detay 
Atıf Yapanlar
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
