Özet:

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to retrospective assess the need for periodontal and/or endodontic treatment of the neighbor’s second molar tooth after the operational drawing of the embedded mandibules. Tools and Methods: This retrospective study was carried out using clinical and radiological records of patients who have completed their treatments and have applied to our clinic for the third molar operation of embedded mandibules between January 2018 and February 2019. Clinical records were studied using the faculty’s electronic archive system and the patient’s age and gender and second molar tooth’s treatment notes were recorded. In the panoramic radiographs of pre-operation and postoperation, according to the Pell-Gregory and Winter classification, the anatomical position of the third molar tooth and the pathological findings observed in the second molar tooth were assessed. Results: A total of 1356 patients (777 women, 579 men; an average age of 26.3 ± 7.4) were observed 7 endodontic and 185 needed periodontal treatment. In total, 5 of 192 patients needed both treatments; 135 patients (72.2 percent) had bone loss; 36 patients (19.2 percent) had periodontal interval expansion and 2 patients (11.1 percent) had root resorption. According to the Pell-Gregory and Winter classifications, statistically significant differences were found between the position of the tooth and the need for endodontic and/or periodontal treatment (p<0. However, there is no statistically significant difference between age and gender and the need for treatment (p>0.05). The result: In our study, according to the Pell-Gregory vertical depth classification, Class C and Winter classification, the mesyoangular position of the teeth affects the need for postoperative endodontic treatment; again, the second molar position of the teeth in the mesyoangular position is affected by the periodontal state of the second molar teeth.

Anahtar Kelimeler: