Abstract:

The action of value independence, which remains a legacy from classical sociology, has been perceived in a very narrow manner throughout the development of sociology, which has led to the blindness of sociology against ethical, anthropological and political insights to be a pure science. In this article, I try to reveal that in Marx, Durkheim and Weber’s works, the valuable independent sociology design does not lead to giving up ethical, anthropological and political thoughts. In Marx, the scientific draft cannot be separated from the concept of "elastry" that has normative dimensions. Although Durkheim distinguishes facts and values at the beginning of his career, he subsequently synthesizes facts and values, concepts and ideals and a creative philosophy that can eventually be called nature and society "specular naturalism". Even Weber, who strongly defends the difference between the facts and values, tries to come through the gap between instrumental rationality and value rationality. Another central claim of the article is that the three of the predecessors are an individuality that their ethical visions can be called "social individuality". Sociological individuality is an individuality that tries to unite the individual with society instead of contradicting it, which sees man as a whole in his mental and emotional dimensions.

Keywords: