Özet:

Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging is used in the diagnosis of meniscus and joint injuries in the knee. Our purpose in this study is to retrospective compare the arthroscopic resonance imaging data of this type of pathologies in the knee with the arthroscopic resonance imaging data.Method: 62 patients were included in the study, clinically considered meniscus and/or connectivity injury after trauma. The average age of patients was 36.8 (18-69 years). 37 of the patients (59.7%) were male and 25 (40.3%) were female. 35 (%56.5) left, 27 (%43.5) left knee injury was present. In the clinical assessment and magnetic resonance imaging, the pathology was considered and the results of the magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy were evaluated of patients who had been carried out arthroscopy. Results: According to the arthroscopy results, 35 (%56.4) patients isolated medial meniscus broken, 11(%17.7) patients isolated lateral meniscus broken, 5 (%8) patients isolated front-cross-connection injury, 2 (%3.2) patients medial meniscus broken and front-cross-connection injury, 2 (%3.2) patients lateral meniscus broken and front-cross-connection injury, 5 (%8) patients medial meniscus and lateral meniscus broken, 2 (%3.2) patients medial meniscus, front-cross-connection and back-cross-connection broken. In the evaluation of the magnetic resonance imaging medial meniscus insensitivity of 95,5%, specificity of 76,4, positive predictive value (PPD) of 91.4, negative predictive value (NPD) of 86.6, accuracy ratio of 90.3; sensitivity for lateral meniscus of 72.2, specificity of 93.1, PPD of 81. 2, NPD 89.1, accuracy ratio 87; sensitivity for front cross connection 90.9, specificity 88.2, PPD 62.5, NPD 97.8, accuracy ratio 88.7; sensitivity for back cross connection 100; specificity 98.3, PPD 66.6, NPD 100; accuracy ratio 98.3 were identified.

Anahtar Kelimeler: