Özet:

In the case of Sherr, Molla Sadrâ refers to the first thing to be the destruction of a kemalin from the zât of the thing or the other possible beings have two definitions in the form of any kind of nonsense.    Molla Sadrâ divides it into two parts: true and relative to not fall into the paradox in which evil exists. True evil does not need a false because it is absolute absence. Molla Sadrâ explains the sheriff in four categories: metaphysical, of course, moral and perceptive. He uses Aristotle’s “most beautiful world” theory to solve the problem of the relationship of evil with the divine creation. It is a good thing, a good thing, a good thing, a good thing, a good thing, a good thing, a good thing, a good thing, a good thing, a good thing, a good thing. They are the best of the world, the best of the world, the best of the world. Then the problem of godly accident and fate will be solved.

Özet:

Mulla Sadra mentions two definitions about evil, one of them is that something lacking of essence or lacking of its a perfection and the other one is that all possible living creatures may have deficiencies. In order not to fall into the paradox of some existence are evils, he describes evils in terms of two ways that are by itself evil and relative evil. By itself evil is absolute non-existence so that it doesn’t need perpetrator. Mulla Sadra describes the evil as four categories that metaphysical, natural, moral and perceptual. He utilizes Aristotle's finest universe theory to solve the problem of relation between evilness and spiritual creation. Mulla Sadra he explains five universes with the example of absolute goodness, much goodness then less evil, goodness and evil are equal, less goodness much evil, and certain evil. He proves the most beautiful universe as much goodness then les evilness. Then he solves the problem of evil in terms of recognition divine decree and destiny.

Anahtar Kelimeler: