User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 3
 Views 34
 Downloands 18
HMK m. 353/1-a Uyarınca Verilen Kararların Kesinliği Meselesi
2023
Journal:  
Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Bölge adliye mahkemesince verilen ilk derece mahkemesi kararının kaldırılıp gönderilmesi kararının kesin olduğu Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu m. 353/1-a’da düzenlenmektedir. 7251 sayılı Kanun ile “Temyiz Edilemeyen Kararlar” başlıklı Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu m. 362’ye, gönderme kararlarının temyizi kabil olmadığı yönünde (g) bendi eklenmiştir. Çalışmamıza konu kararda Yargıtay, Kanun’da sayılan gönderme kararı verilebilecek durumlar mevcut değilken verilen gönderme kararının kesin olmadığını belirterek davanın esasını incelemiş ve bozma kararı vermiştir. Yargıtayın çeşitli gerekçeler ile benzer sonuca ulaştığı başka kararları da mevcuttur. Çalışmamızda HMK m. 353/1-a uyarınca verilen kararın temyizi kabil olup olmadığı ve gönderme kararındaki tespitlerin bağlayıcı olup olmadığı 7251 sayılı Kanun öncesi ve sonrası durum göz önüne alınarak değerlendirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Ayrıca inceleme konusu kararda Yargıtay tarafından davanın esasına ilişkin tespitlerde bulunulması hususu da değerlendirilmeye çalışılmıştır.

Keywords:

The Issue Of Conclusiveness Of Judgment Given In Accordance With Article 353/1-a Of The Code Of Civil Procedure
2023
Author:  
Abstract:

In Article 353/1-a of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is regulated that the judgment of the court of appeal that the decision of the court of first instance to be repealed and referred is conclusive. Article 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure, entitled “Unappealable Judgment” with Law No. 7251, has been added to the subparagraph (g) stating that judgments that are referred are not subject to cassation. In the decision that is the subject of our study, the Court of Cassation stated that the referral judgment was not conclusive when there were no situations in which a referral judgment could be made and examined the merits of the case and decided to reverse it. There are also judgments of the Court of Cassation that reached similar conclusions for various reasons. This study tries to evaluate whether the judgment made in accordance with article 353/1-a of the Code of Civil Procedure is appealable and whether the determinations in the referral judgment are binding, considering the situations before and after the Law No. 7251. In addition, in the judgment subject to review, the issue of examining the merits of the case by the Court of Cassation has also been tried to be evaluated.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Hukuk

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 180
Cite : 474
2023 Impact : 0.162
Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi