Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 ASOS INDEKS
 Görüntüleme 7
THE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT CONVENTIONAL CHEMOTHERAPY PROTOCOLS IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA: SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
2004
Dergi:  
Turkish Journal of Oncology
Yazar:  
Özet:

The aim of this study was to present the treatment outcome and follow-up results in patients with multiple myolama treated with three conventional regimens. The data of 85 patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma and followed in our department between 1993 and 2003 were reviewed retrospectively. Fifty-four patients were male and 31 were female and the median age was 58 years (range 39-80). Four patients were stage I, 41 were stage II, and 40 were stage III. Thirty-eight patients received the MP regimen (melphalan and prednisolone), 32 received the VAD regimen (vincristine, adriamycine, and dexamethasone), and 15 received the VMCP regimen (vincristine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisolone) as first-line chemotherapy. Objective response was obtained in 32 patients (37.6%) and treatment failure was detected in 53 (62.4%) patients. According to treatment group objective response was 60%, 47%, and 21% in patients receiving VMCP, VAD and MP respectively. The median follow up period was 12 months (range: 1-133). The Two-year overall survival rate was 74.8% and progression free survival (PFS) rate was 27.7%. However, there was no overall survival advantage among the three different conventional treatment regimens. The One-year PFS rate was significantly superior in patients receiving the VAD regimen (VAD vs MP; p=.016 and VAD vs VMCP; p=.009). In conclusion, VAD may be the prefered treatment regimen in patients with multiple myeloma as a first-line treatment.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler












Turkish Journal of Oncology

Alan :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

Metrikler
Makale : 215
Atıf : 8
Turkish Journal of Oncology