Özet:

Purpose: Our research aims to evaluate the causes of failure, the duration of use, the method of removal and how fixed proteic restorations to be removed for a variety of reasons have affected the person’s daily life in the last 6 months. The study was conducted on 144 participants (86 women; 58 men) between 28-72 (47.6±10.1) years of age. In our study, 143 (99.3%) metals supported porselen restoration, 1 (0.7%) full metal restoration were evaluated. Demographic data, the cause of discharge of fixed protetic restoration, the conformity to the Ante rule, the discharge method, the number of members, the duration of use, the material in which it was made, the section requesting discharge and the patient addressed Oral Health's Daily Life Effect Measurement Index (OIDP) questions were recorded in the research form. For statistical assessment, percentages and Fisher-Freeman-Haltoon tests were used. Results: In the study, a total of 144 fixed prothetic restorations were evaluated. When the causes of decomposition were assessed, support was identified as the first three common causes of pain in the tooth (38.2 percent), problems in periodontal tissues (20.1 percent) and restoration renewal (15.3 percent). When the responses to the OIDP questions were evaluated between the groups, there was no significant difference in terms of assessments outside of work/work life and psychological condition. The result: among the causes of removal of fixed proteic restorations, support tooth pain is the most common cause. Restorations that provide and do not provide the preceding rule have not been determined a significant difference between compared to the causes of the seen failure. In the assessment of success in fixed protetic restorations, the Ante rule, along with the patient-related factors, the preparation of the tooth and the number of restoration renewals, must also be investigated. Keywords: Index Measuring the Effect of Oral Health on Daily Life, Fixed Protein Restoration, Discharge Method, Ante Rule.   Assessment of the Effects of the Removing Causes for Fixed Partial Dentures on Quality of Life of Individuals ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the research was to evaluate the causes of failure of fixed prosthetic restorations, lifetime, removal method and how it affects daily life in the last 6 months. Materials and Methods: The study was performed on 144 participants (86 females; 58 males) ranging age 28 to 72 years (47.6 ± 10.1). of 143 (99. 3%) metal fused to porcelain restoration and 1 (0.7%) all metal restorations were evaluated. Demographic data, reason for removing fixed prosthetic restoration, meeting to Ante law, removing method, number of restoration units, restoration lifetime, restoration material, department requesting removing and Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) questions were recorded in the research form. Percentages and Fisher-Freeman-Haltoon tests were used for statistical evaluation. Results: A total of 144 fixed partial dentures were evaluated. When the reasons for removing were evaluated, toothache (38.2%), periodontal problems (20.1%) and renewing of restoration (15.3%) were determined as the first three reasons. When the answers of OIDP questions were assessed, no significant difference was found except work/work life and psychological status. Conclusion: Toothache is the most common reason for the removal of fixed partial dentures. Ante's law did not make a significant difference in the reasons of the failure of restorations. Other factors such as factors related to the patient, the preparation of the tooth, and the number of renewing of the restorations should be searched in the evaluation of the success in fixed partial dentures. Keywords: Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP),fixed partial denture, removing method, Ante law.

Anahtar Kelimeler: