User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 2
 Views 20
 Downloands 3
BİLGİSAYAR DESTEKLİ TASARIM-BİLGİSAYAR DESTEKLİ ÜRETİM VE PRESLEME SİSTEMLERİYLE ÜRETİLEN PORSELEN LAMİNAT VENERLERİN KENAR VE İNTERNAL UYUMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI: İN-VİTRO ÇALIŞMA
2017
Journal:  
Current Research in Dental Sciences
Author:  
Abstract:

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, Bilgisayar destekli tasarım-Bilgisayar destekli üretim ve Isı ile Presleme yöntemleriyle üretilmiş porselen laminat venerlerin kenar ve iç yüzey uyumlarının karşılaştırılmasıdır.   Gereç ve yöntem: Kenar ve iç yüzey uyumlarının fabrikasyon tekniğine göre farklılık gösterip göster- mediğini belirlemek amacıyla toplam 40 adet porselen laminat vener değerlendirildi. Venerler, Bilgisayar des- tekli tasarım-Bilgisayar destekli üretim ve Isı ile Presleme yöntemleriyle üretildi (n=20). Kenar ve iç yüzey uyumları replika tekniği kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Her bir venerin replikası akışkan kıvamlı elastomerik ölçü materyali kulanı- larak alındı ve replikalar, meziyo-distal ve insizo-gingival yönde kesildi. Her bir kesitin iç yüzey ve kenar uyumları ışık mikroskobunda x40 büyütme kullanılarak ölçüldü. İç yüzey uyumu için 9 nokta, kenar uyum içinse 3 nokta ölçüldü ve ortalamaları alındı. Levene ve independent samples t testi kullanılarak istatistiksel analiz yapıldı (p<0,05).    Bulgular: Isı ile Presleme sistemi ile üretilen venerlerin kenar aralık değerleri (269±136,92 μm), Bilgisayar destekli tasarım-Bilgisayar destekli üretim ile üretilenlere (192±61,02 μm) göre daha yüksektir (p= 0,028). İki yöntemin iç yüzey aralık değerleri karşılaştırıldığında yine, Isı ile Presleme sistemi ile üretilen venerlerin iç yüzey aralık değerleri (190,43±63,33 μm), Bilgisayar destekli tasarım-Bilgisayar destekli üretim ile üretilenlere (105,61±24,39 μm) göre daha yüksektir (p=0,00). Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın kısıtlamaları dahilinde, Bilgisayar destekli tasarım-Bilgisayar destekli üretim yöntemi ile üre- tilen porselen laminat venerlerin kenar ve iç yüzey uyum- ları, Isı ile Presleme sistemi ile üretilenlere göre daha iyidir.    Anahtar Kelimeler: Laminat vener,  Bilgisayar destekli tasarım-Bilgisayar destekli üretim, Isı ile Presleme, Kenar uyum, İç yüzey uyumu, Replika yöntemi COMPARISON OF MARGINAL AND INTERNAL ADAPTATION OF COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN-COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING AND HEAT-PRESSED CERAMIC LAMINATE VENEERS: AN IN-VITRO STUDY ABSTRACT   Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the marginal and internal adaptations of porcelain laminate veneers produced with Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing and Heat-pressed techniques. Material and Methods: A total of 40 porcelain laminate veneers were evaluated whether the marginal and internal adaptations are changed due to fabrication technique. The veneers were fabricated with Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing and Heat-pressed techniques (n=20). The marginal and internal adaptations of veneers were measured by using a replica technique. Replicas of each veneer were obtained by using a light-body silicone impression material. The replicas were sectioned mesio-distally and gingivo-incisally. Then the marginal and internal gap adaptation of each cross section were measured by a stereomicros- cope at x40 magnification. Nine measurement locations for internal, 3 measurement locations for marginal adaptation were used to obtain the mean values. Levene and independent samples t-test was used to identify the statistical difference among the groups (p<0.05). Results:  The mean marginal adaptation values of Heat-pressed and Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing veneers were 269±136.92 μm and 192± 61.02 μm respectively. There was a significant difference between the values (p=0.028). A significant difference was found between the internal adaptation values of Heat-pressed (190.43±63.33 μm) and Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing veneers (105.61± 24.39 μm) (p=0.00). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, the Computer aided design-Computer aided manufac- turing veneers showed statistically better marginal and internal adaptation values than the Heat-pressed veneers. Keywords: Laminate veneer, Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing, Heat-pressed, Marginal adaptation, Internal adaptation, Replica technique

Keywords:

Information-supported design-information-supported production and pressing systems are produced by porselen laminate vents with the internal and internal compatibilities: IN-VITRO
2017
Author:  
Abstract:

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare the edge and interior surface compatibility of computer-supported design-computer-supported production and thermal-pressing methods produced porselain laminate venus.   Tools and methods: A total of 40 porselain laminate venus were evaluated in order to identify the manufacturing technique of the edge and interior surface conformities. Vens were manufactured by computer des- single design-computer-supported production and thermal pressing methods (n=20). The boundary and inner surface conformities were assessed using the replica technique. The replica of each venus was taken from the curve of the fluid elastomeric measurement material and the replicas were cut in the direction of mesio-distal and insizo-gingival. The internal surface and edge compatibility of each cut was measured using the x40 enlargement in the light microscope. 9 points for internal surface conformity, 3 points for boundary conformity were measured and the average was taken. Statistical analysis was carried out using Levene and independent samples t test (p<0,05).    Results: The marginal range values of the vents produced by heat and pressure system (269±136,92 μm) are higher than those produced by computer-supported design (192±61,02 μm) (p=0,028). When compared the internal surface range values of the two methods, the internal surface range values of the vents produced by heat and pressure system (190,43±63,33 μm) are higher than those produced by computer-supported design-computer-supported production (105,61±24,39 μm) (p=0,00). Result: Within the limits of this study, computer-supported design-computer-supported production method is better than those produced by the heating with the pressure system, the edge and interior surface of the porselen laminate venus.    Keywords: Laminate vener, Computer-supported design-Computer-supported production, Heat with Pressure, Count Compatibility, Internal Surface Compatibility, Replika method COMPARISON OF MARGINAL AND INTERNAL ADAPTATION OF COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN-COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING AND HEAT-PRESSED CERAMIC LAMINATE VENEERS: AN IN-VITRO STUDY ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the marginal and internal adaptations of porcelain laminate veneers produced with Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing and Heat-pressed techniques. Material and Methods: A total of 40 porcelain laminate veneers were evaluated whether the marginal and internal adaptations are changed due to manufacturing technique. The veneers were manufactured with Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing and Heat-pressed techniques (n=20). The marginal and internal adaptations of veneers were measured by using a replica technique. Replicas of each veneer were obtained by using a light-body silicone impression material. The replicas were sectioned mesio-distally and gingivo-incisally. Then the marginal and internal gap adaptation of each cross section were measured by a stereomicros- cope at x40 magnification. Nine measurement locations for internal, 3 measurement locations for marginal adaptation were used to obtain the average values. Levene and independent samples were used to identify the statistical difference between the groups (p<0.05). Results: The average marginal adaptation values of Heat-pressed and Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing veneers were 269±136.92 μm and 192±61.02 μm respectively. There was a significant difference between the values (p=0.028). A significant difference was found between the internal adaptation values of Heat-pressed (190.43±63.33 μm) and Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing veneers (105.61±24.39 μm) (p=0.00). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, the Computer aided design-Computer aided manufac-turing veneers showed statistically better marginal and internal adaptation values than the Heat-pressed veneers. Keywords: Laminate veneer, Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing, Heat-pressed, Marginal adaptation, Internal adaptation, Replica technique

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Current Research in Dental Sciences

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 1.431
Cite : 2.169
Quarter
Basic Field of Health Sciences
Q4
192/222

Current Research in Dental Sciences