Citation Number
2
Views
59
Downloands
25
Klâsik Türk Edebiyatı geleneği içinde yazılmış divanlarda zaman zaman, aynı ya da büyük oranda benzer şiirlerle farklı şairlerin divanlarında karşılaşmak mümkündür. Bunların bazıları nazire geleneği içinde benzerlik gösterirken bazılarının benzerlik sebebi müşterek yazılmalarıdır. Bazen de ortak mahlas kullanımından kaynaklanan karışıklık, aynı şiirin farklı divanlara girmesine sebep olabilir. Nev‘î-zâde Atâyî ile Nevâlî-zâde Atâyî aynı asırda yaşamış, çağdaş iki şairdir. Aynı mahlası kullanmaları da bir başka ortak yönleridir. Söz konusu şairlerin divanlarının neşirleri incelendiğinde, aynı gazelin her iki şairin divanında da yer aldığı görülmektedir. Belli ki iki şairin de Atâyî mahlasını kullanması bir karışıklığa sebep olmuş ve bu mahlas benzerliği nedeniyle aynı gazel her iki şairin de divan nüshalarına ve neşirlerine girmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, 5 beyitten oluşan bu gazelin gerçekte kime ait olduğunu/olabileceğini tespit etmeye çalışmaktır. Nev’î-zâde ve Nevâlî-zâde divanların neşirleriyle şairlerin hayatları hakkında bilgi verip eserlerinden örnekler sunan tezkire ve biyografik kaynaklardan hareketle söz konusu gazelin hangi Atâyî’ye ait olduğu yahut olabileceği belirlenmeye çalışılacaktır.
In the classical Turkish literature tradition, it is possible to meet in the divans of different poets with the same or much similar poems from time to time. Some of these are similar in the Nazis tradition, while some are similar because they are written by client. Sometimes the confusion caused by the common use of the salmon can cause the same poem to enter different seals. He is a poet, and he is a poet, and he is a poet, and he is a poet. The use of the same shell is also another common side. When we look at the pleasures of the poets, we see that the same gazeline is also in the poets of both. It is clear that the use of the two poets of the Ataiya mahlas has caused a confusion and due to this mahlas similarity the same gazel has entered both the divan nuts and pleasures of both poets. The aim of this study is to try to identify who this gasoline, which consists of 5 brains, actually belongs to. On the other hand, it is important to note that, in the case of a person who has the right to do so, a person who has the right to do so, a person who has the right to do so, a person who has the right to do so, a person who has the right to do so, a person who has the right to do so, a person who has the right to do so, a person who has the right to do so, a person who has the right to do so, a person who has the right to do so.
In the some diwans which are written in the Classical Turkish Literature tradition, sometimes, it is possible to encounter to same or with a large extent similar poems in the different poet’s books. When some of them are similar in the nazire tradition, some of them are similar because they are written in cooperation. Sometimes, confusion resulting from using the same mahlas pen name cause inclusion of same poems in different diwans. Nevi-zade Atayi and Nevali-zade Atayi are two contemporary poets having lived in the same century. Their other common characteristics is using the same mahlas. When the published diwans of these poets are examined, it is seen that same gazelle is included in both poets’ diwans. Apparently, both poets’ using Atayi pen name, led to confusion and because of this similarity of mahlas, same gazelle is included in both poets’ diwan copy and publishing. Purpose of this work is to identify the poet of the gazelle comprised of 5 verses. Based on Nevi-zade Atayi and Nevali- zade diwans publishing and resources and tezkires that give information about the life of poets and examples of their books, it is tried to determine to which Atayi aforementioned gazelle belongs.
Field : Filoloji
Journal Type : Uluslararası
Article Detail 
Citation Owners
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
