Özet:

Title:RELIBILITY AND VALIDITY STUDY OF THE PATIENT EXPECTATIONS AND SATISFACTION WITH PRENATAL CARE INSTRUMENT IN TURKEY Summary: The purpose of the study is to make the version of the "PATIENT EXPECTATIONS AND SATISFACTION STUDY OF THE PATIENT EXPECTATIONS AND SATISFACTION WITH PRENATAL CARE INSTRUMENT IN TURKEY Summary: The purpose of the study is to make the version of the "PATIENT EXPECTATIONS AND SATISFACTION STUDY OF THE PATIENT EXPECTATIONS AND SATISFACTION STUDY OF THE PATIENT EXPECTATIONS AND SATISFACTION STUDY OF THE PATIENT EXPECTATION Method and Method: This metadological research was conducted with 167 pregnancies from October 2013 to February 2014 with the Ministry of Health from the Isparta Women's Birth and Child Diseases Hospital and the University of Süleyman Demirel Research and Application Hospital, which requested to be examined in the women's-birth clinics. The data is collected by face-to-face interview technique. The verifying factor analysis technique has been used to statistically determine the structural validity of the measurement. For the scope of validity, the opinion of 6 experts on the subject has been requested and the results of the assessments of the experts have not been removed from scale. Results and Results: The Cronbach α reliability ratio is calculated to test the reliability of the measurement. Cronbach α value is 0. 85; 0.95 for satisfaction materials. According to the result of the substance-comprehensive correlation analysis, there is a statistically meaningful relationship between expectation and satisfaction substances and all expectation points. The Turkish version of the Pregnancy Care Satisfaction and Patient Expectations Measurement has been found to be a valid and reliable tool to measure pregnant women’s satisfaction and expectations regarding Pregnancy Care. Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study is to test the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Patient Expectations And Satisfaction With Prenatal Care Instrument (PESPC). This instrument was developed in 2001 by Omar at al. To measure women’s expectations and satisfaction with their prenatal health care. Methods: This methodological descriptive study involved a total of 167 volunteered pregnant women who admit to the Isparta Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital and Suleyman Demirel University Research and Application Hospital for examination, between October 2013 and February 2014 the dates. All data collected by authors during face-to-face interviews. The Turkish version of the instrument has been translated using a back-translation technique. Confirmatory factor analysis has been used to determine the construction validity of the instrument. The internal consistency has been used to determine the reliability of the instrument. It has been asked to 6 experts for content validity about the subject and after their evaluations there is no subject removed from the scale. Results and Conclusion: The value of the Cronbach's alpha is 0.85 for expectation subjects; 0.95 for gratitude subjects. According to the results of the subject-total correlation analysis made, there is a meaningful relationship between the expectation and gratitude subjects and all expectation points statistically. As a result the Patient Expectations And Satisfaction With Prenatal Care Instrument of the Turkish version it will be a reliable and valid means to measure expectations and satisfaction for prenatal care in pregnant women. Keywords: reliability, validity, prenatal care, expectation, satisfaction.  Keywords: Reliability, Validity, Prenatal Care, Expectations, Satisfaction Supporting institutions: No support from any institution Source: Aksayan S, Eye S. Guidelines for Intercultural Scale Adaptation I: Scale Adaptation Steps and Language Adaptation. Journal of Nursing Research 2002; 4 (1): 9-14. Armour K. Antepartum Maternal-Fetal Assessment Using Surveillance to Improve Maternal and Fetal Outcomes. Lifelines 2004; 8 (3): 232-240. Bee K, Mete S. Prenatal Self-Evaluation Scale Validity and Trust Study. Ataturk University Nursing Higher School Journal 2008; 11(1): 16-24. by Bozkurt. Evaluation of mother satisfaction in normal birth and Caesar birth. The Higher Graduate. Istanbul: Istanbul University Institute of Health Sciences; 2013. The great, the great, the great, the great, the great, the great, the great. Scientific methods of research. Ankara: Pegem Academy; 2010. Byrne DL, Asmussen T, Freeman JH. Descriptive Terms for Women Attending Antenatal Clinics: Mother Knows Best? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000; 107: 1233-1236. The Sea KZ. Adaptation of the psychological measurement tool. The University of Ankara School of Education Sciences 2007; 40(1): 1-16. Blood is reliable and valid in scales. The U.T.F. 2004; 30 (3): 211-216. Eye S, Aksayan S. Guide to Scale Adjustment between Cultures II: Psychometric Characteristics and Comparison between Cultures. Hemar-G 2003; 1: 3-14. Smile C, Azak M. Birth, Family Planning, Gynecology Nursing. Announced by: Announced by: Announced by: 1995 I. Improving the scale of appreciation of mother’s satisfaction at birth. The doctor’s thesis. Istanbul: Istanbul University Institute of Health Sciences; 2009. by Karasar N. Scientific research methods, principles and techniques.7. Ankara: Research Education Consultancy Ltd; 1995; 25-100. H. Wijma Birth Forecast / Experience Scale A version of validity and reliability study. The Higher Graduate. Antalya: Mediterranean University Institute of Health Sciences; 2009. Omar AM, Schiffman RF, Bingham CR.  Development and Testing of the Patient Expectations and Satisfaction With Prenatal Care Instrument. Res Nurs Health 2001; 24: 218-229. Recommended N. A Methodology Model in Intercultural Scale Adjustment, Journal of Psychology IV. Special number of the National Congress of Psychology 1997; 6 (2): 80-82. On the other hand, it is important to note that, in the case of a non-compliance with the provisions of paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph PDF Access Date: 23.01.2017 Ozdamar K. Statistical Data Analysis with Package Programs. and 5. and pressure. Previous articleEskişehir: Kaan Library; 2014 Preacher KJ, MacCallum RC. Exploratory Factor Analysis in Behavior Genetics Research: Factor Recovery with Smallsample Size. Behav Genet 2002; 32 (2): 153-161. The Rabbit E. Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. and 5. and pressure. Ankara: The Nobel Broadcasting House; 2014; 33-172.

Anahtar Kelimeler: