Görüntüleme
14
İndirme
9
Bir bilgi inşa etme tarzı olarak sosyal bilimin kimliği, 19. yüzyılda doğa bilimleri/ kültür ve beşeri bilimler ayrımının epistemolojik / metodolojik saflaşmasının ürünü olarak ortaya çıktı ve bu saflaşmada iyiyi vaaz etme yetkesini sosyal bilimler üstlenirken, doğruyu vaaz etme yetkesi ise doğa bilimlerine bırakıldı. İlk kertede, sosyal bilimler ve doğa bilimlerinin doğru ile iyi arasındaki bu bilimsel taksimatı kabul edilebilir gözüktü. Gerçekte ise, iyinin ve doğrunun birbirlerinden kopuk ve izole edilmiş olarak çıktıkları tarihsel yolculukta, hem sosyal bilimler hem de doğa bilimleri, iktidar ve güç yapılarıyla aralarındaki ahlaki, vicdani ve bilimsel mesafeyi korumakta başarısız oldular ve araçsal aklın egemenliğinde hem doğrunun hem de iyinin saflığı yapı bozumuna uğradı. En genel çerçevede değerlendirildiğinde, bilimler, özgürlük idealini betimleyebilecekleri bir konum almaktan çok uzaklaştılar. Bu makale, sosyal bilimler ve doğa bilimlerinin, doğru ile iyi arasında inşa ettikleri dikatominin biçimlendirdiği iki kültürlü mirasın krizlerine ve epistemolojik bunalımlarına özellikle vurgu yapmaktadır. Çıkış yolları çerçevesinde ise, bilimlerde parçalılığın reddi ve bütünsel bilim arayışlarını çağdaş yaklaşımlar ve güncel tartışmalar bağlamında betimlemeyi amaçlamaktadır.
The identity of social science as a way of building knowledge appeared in the 19th century as a product of epistemological/methodological purification of the distinction between natural sciences/cultural and human sciences, and in this purification the power to preach the good was assumed by social sciences, while the power to preach the truth was left to the natural sciences. At first, this scientific taxation between the right and the good of social sciences and natural sciences seemed acceptable. Indeed, in the historical journey of good and truth, which is divided and isolated from each other, both social sciences and natural sciences, power and power structures have failed to preserve the moral, conscientious and scientific distance between them, and in the domination of instrumental mind the purity of truth and good has been structurally broken. When assessed in the most general framework, scientists were far away from taking a position in which they could describe the ideal of freedom. This article especially emphasizes the crises and epistemological disorders of the two cultural heritage in which social sciences and natural sciences form the dicatom between right and good. In the framework of the outputs, it aims to describe the rejection of fragmentation in science and the comprehensive scientific search in the context of contemporary approaches and current discussions.
The identity of social science as a way of building knowledge emerged in the 19th century as the product of the epistemological / methodological purification of the distinction between natural sciences / culture and humanities. In this purification, the authority to preach the good was undertaken by the social sciences, while the authority to preach the truth was left to the natural sciences. In the first instance, this scientific division between the right and the good of the social and natural sciences seemed acceptable. In fact, both the social and natural sciences have failed to maintain the moral, conscientious and scientific distance between the structures of power and power in the historical journey in which the good and the truth have emerged isolated from each other. Thus, the purity of both truth and good under the rule of instrumental reason deconstructed. In the most general context, the sciences are far from taking a position in which they can describe the ideal of freedom. This article places particular emphasis on the crises and epistemological crises of the bi-cultural heritage shaped by the dichotomy of social and natural sciences built between right and good. Within the framework of the ways out, it aims to describe the rejection of fragmentation in the sciences and the search for holistic science in the context of contemporary approaches and current debates.
Alan : Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Makale Detay 
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Alıntı Yap
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
