Özet:

As one of the most important practices of the one-party period, rural policy was aimed at ensuring development in the villages. With the idea that development and development in the villages will also develop the state, this policy has been implemented through various channels. One of these channels was public magazines These magazines, both presented public teaching messages and made the vocabulary of national politics. In this study, which is prepared by movement on the issue of how much local countryside speaking finds a response and how much it can be applied, a local magazine of the Başpınar Halkevi magazine has been referred to the processing of the countryside policy. The work is questioning how the general policy on agriculture is reflected in the local area. The study aims to study the writing, poems, games and articles contained in the magazine and to compare them to national speech and to deal with the harmony or incompatibility between local and local rural speech. In the study first the basic idea where the village speech was placed in national politics, the ideology and the practices were placed, then the village speech of the Capital Magazine was studied. The teaching model, defined as the main practicer of the countryside, is determined as the main element aimed at the development of the village, while the general framework of the countryside policy is determined by the elite structure. In addition to the implemented practices, the imaginary village image that remains on paper shows that this selective structure is far from the village reality. At this point, the study believes that national and local speech is compatible with each other and that both are insufficient in achieving the main objective.

Anahtar Kelimeler: