User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 14
 Downloands 6
Ekstrakorporal şok dalga litotripsi ve perkütan nefrolitotominin renal fonksiyonlar üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması
2013
Journal:  
The New Journal of Urology
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective: In this study, we compared the effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy SWL and percutaneous nephrolithotomy PNL on local and global renal functions by single photon emission computed tomography SPECT . Materials and Methods: Patients with renal pelvis stones sized between 1.5 and 2.5 cm were prospectively randomised into SWL n22 and PNL n:20 groups between February 2006-December 2011. An electrohydraulic generator was used for SWL. A single posterior lower caliceal access was used for PNL. Technetium99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid Tc99m-DMSA was used for SPECT scans. SPECT scans, obtained one week before and 6 months after treatment, were compared for local and global renal functions. Results: 15 68% cases of SWL group mean stone size:19,3±3mm were stonefree after treatment average shock number: 5458±1251 . There were residual fragments in the lower calyx in 5 cases. Ureterorenoscopic pneumatic lithotripsy was performed in another 2 cases due to nonpassing ureteral fragments. Stones of the patients in PNL group mean stone size:20,1±2,4mm were removed completely. When pretreatment and posttreatment SPECT scans were compared, loss in local and global uptakes of the treated kidneys were 2,64±0,83% and 3,36±0,78% in SWL group and 1,56±0,62% and 2,68±1,1% in PNL group, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups. Conclusion: Although SWL seems a less traumatic method in treatment of renal calculi, several repeat sessions are required for large calculi. So, the consequent parenchymal injury is more after SWL. When a decision is to be made between SWL and PNL for treatment of renal calculi, this situation should be considered

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










The New Journal of Urology

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 518
Cite : 74
The New Journal of Urology