User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 3
 Views 21
 Downloands 5
Nakit Temettü Tahmininde Makine Öğrenmesi Yaklaşımı: İmalat Sektörü Üzerine Bir Araştırma
2016
Journal:  
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Sermaye piyasalarında yapılacak yatırım kararlarını doğrudan etkileyen bir faktör olan temettü dağıtımı, işletmenin geçmiş performansını gösterdiği kadar gelecekteki performansı hakkında da ipuçları vermektedir. Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de halka açık işletmeler tarafından dağıtılan temettülerin tahmininde Marsh&Merton (M&M) modelinin kullanılabilirliğinin test edilmesi ve makine öğrenme tekniklerini uygulayarak, M&M’dan daha iyi bir model geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada nakit dağıtılan temettü oranı tahmininde Borsa İstanbul (BİST)’da işlem gören imalat sektöründeki 139 işletmenin 2003-2012 yılları arasındaki verileri kullanılarak M&M modeli ile makine öğrenme tekniğine dayalı Çok Katmanlı Algılayıcı (Bir ve İki Gizli Katmanlı ÇKA), Radyal Tabanlı Fonksiyon Ağları (RTFA), Destek Vektör Makineleri (DVM) ve Adaptif Sinirsel Bulanık Çıkarsama Sistemleri (ASBÇS) şeklinde beş farklı model karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda ASBÇS modelinin belli tolerans değerlerinde temettü tahmininde en başarılı makine öğrenme yöntemi olduğu gözlenmiştir. Genel olarak ASBÇS ve RTFA modellerinin M&M modelinden daha iyi performans gösterdiği, ÇKA modellerinin M&M modeline yakın sonuçlar sergilediği, DVM modelinin ise M&M’dan daha kötü sonuçlar verdiği görülmüştür.

Keywords:

Mechanical Learning Approach in Cash Based Forecast: A Research on the Manufacturing Sector
2016
Author:  
Abstract:

A factor that directly affects investment decisions made on capital markets, the distribution of funds provides clues about the future performance of the enterprise as much as it shows its past performance. In this study in Turkey, the prediction of the supplies distributed by public enterprises in Turkey is to test the availability of the Marsh&M (M&M) model and apply machine learning techniques, aimed at developing a better model than M&M. In the study, the estimate of the cash-distributed asset ratio of 139 enterprises in the manufacturing sector operated in Borsa Istanbul (BIST) using the data between 2003-2012, the M&M model and the multi-layer detector (One and Two Hidden Layer CKA), Radial-Based Function Networks (RTFA), Support Vector Machines (DVM) and Adaptive Nervous Bullying Extrusion Systems (ASBÇS) compared five different models. The study found that the ASBÇS model was a successful machine learning method for certain tolerance values. In general, ASBÇS and RTFA models have shown better performance than M&M models, CKA models have shown results close to M&M models, and DVM models have shown worse results than M&M models.

Keywords:

A Machine Learning Approach For Cash Dividends’ Forecasting: A Research On Manufacturing Sector
2016
Author:  
Abstract:

Dividend payment is a factor that affects investment decisions in capital markets. Although dividend payments indicate past performance of corporate, they also give some clues about company’s future performance. In this study, feasibility of Marsh&Merton (M&M) model is tested in Turkey tried to develop a better model than M&M model by applying machine learning techniques. For this study payout ratios between 2003 and 2012 from 139 manufacturing companies which are quoted on ISE are selected. M&M model and five machine learning models namely Multi-Layer Perception (MLP), Radial Based Function Networks (RBFN), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) are compared with each other. Generally it is occurred that RBFN models produces similar results with M&M model, MLP models cannot forecast low paid dividend and SVM model executes worse than M&M model. As a result ANFIS model is observed the most successful method in forecasting dividends.

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 423
Cite : 3.276
2023 Impact : 0.129
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi