User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 19
 Downloands 1
Comparison between the Brazilian Technical Regulation on Good Practices for Food Services and complementary laws in the Southern Region
2015
Journal:  
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnología
Author:  
Abstract:

Abstract This study attempted to compare the sanitary regulations for food services in the Southern Region of the country, with Federal Technical Regulations. The study used a descriptive and exploratory approach with data collected between March and July 2010 and updated in August 2015. Interviews with those responsible for the food sector in the Health Surveillance Agency were recorded, transcribed, and approved for use. The interviews aided analysis and comparison of the different health regulations. The most similar regulation came from Rio Grande do Sul Secretary of Health, which established a specific regulation for the responsibilities and training of food handlers. Another similar regulation was the Ordinance design, which used a structured checklist and compliance percentage. In contrast, Santa Catarina State’s resolution, despite its checklist design, presents fewer similarities. The Health Surveillance Agency of the state of Paraná had no complementary laws, published a specific Technical Note for street food. Author Biography Ana Lúcia de Freitas Saccol, Centro Universitário Fanciscano, Santa Maria, RS Possui graduação em Farmácia e Bioquímica Tec. e Ciências dos Alimentos pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), graduação em Nutrição pelo Centro Universitário Franciscano, mestrado e doutorado em Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos pela UFSM, na linha de Qualidade de Alimentos. Atualmente é professora do Curso de Nutrição do Centro Universitário Franciscano. Consultora do Programa Alimentos Seguros (PAS) SENAI/SEBRAE/SESC/SESI. Proprietária da empresa Alimentos & Alimentação (Assessoria em Qualidade). Autora de livros na área de programas de garantia e controle da qualidade no setor de alimentação. Atua principalmente nos seguintes temas: garantia e controle de qualidade, educação alimentar, vigilância sanitária e Boas Práticas Downloads PDF-PT (Português (Brasil)) Additional Files Carta de declaração (Português (Brasil)) Published 2015-11-27 How to Cite Saccol, A. L. de F., Silva, M. N. da, Oliveira, A. B. A. de, Hecktheuer, L. H. R., & Silva Jr, E. A. da. (2015). Comparison between the Brazilian Technical Regulation on Good Practices for Food Services and complementary laws in the Southern Region. Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology, 3(4), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.3395/2317-269x.00454 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Issue Vol. 3 No. 4 (2015): November Section Articles License Copyright (c) 2015 Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology (Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnología) – “Visa em Debate”

Keywords:

null
2015
Author:  
0
2015
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnología

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 631
Cite : 3
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnología