User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 7
 Views 41
 Downloands 7
İlkokul Matematik Dersi Öğretim Programı Kazanımlarının TIMSS-2019 Değerlendirme Çerçevesine Göre Analizi
2020
Journal:  
Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Bu çalışmanın amacı, TIMSS-2019 bilişsel alan becerilerini temel alarak 2018 yılı ilkokul matematik dersi öğretim programındaki kazanımların sınıf düzeylerine ve öğrenme alanlarına göre analizini yapmaktır. Nitel araştırma desenlerinden durum çalışması deseninin uygulandığı çalışmada veri toplama yaklaşımı olarak doküman analizi yapılmış, kazanımların sınıflandırılması amacıyla nitel veri analizi tekniklerinden betimsel analiz kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada, birinci sınıftan dördüncü sınıfa kadar olan toplam 229 tane kazanım ifadesi değerlendirmeye tabi tutulmuş, söz konusu kazanımların bilişsel özelliklerinin 1.’den 4.’ye doğru sınıf düzeylerine göre ve öğrenme alanlarına göre değişimi analiz edilmiştir. Bulgulara göre tüm kazanımların %58’i bilme, %32’si uygulama ve %10’u akıl yürütme basamağındadır. Sınıf düzeyleri karşılaştırıldığında, 1. sınıftan 4. sınıfa doğru gidildikçe bilme düzeyindeki kazanım sayılarının azaldığı, akıl yürütme basamağındaki kazanım sayılarının ise arttığı görülmüştür. Bulgular ışığında sonuçlar tartışılmış ve bazı önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Keywords:

Primary School Mathematics Course Teaching Program Results Analysis According to the TIMSS-2019 Assessment Framework
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

The aim of this study is to analyze the achievements in the 2018 Primary School Mathematics Curriculum based on class levels and learning fields, based on TIMSS-2019 cognitive field skills. Qualitative research patterns have been conducted as a document analysis as a data collection approach in the study in which the status study patterns are applied, the qualitative data analysis techniques have been used for the purpose of classification of achievements. In the study, a total of 229 behavior expressions from first to fourth class were assessed, with the cognitive characteristics of the behavior in question 1.from 4.The change has been analyzed according to the right class levels and the fields of learning. According to the findings, 58% of all achievements are in knowledge, 32% in practice and 10% in mindfulness. Compared to class levels, the number of achievements at the level of knowledge decreased as the number of achievements at the level of understanding increased as the number of achievements at the level of understanding increased. In light of the findings, the results were discussed and some recommendations were made.

Keywords:

An Analysis Of Turkish Primary School Mathematics Curriculum Learning Outcomes In Terms Of Timss-2019 Assessment Frameworks
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

The aim of this study is to analyze learning outcomes of 2018 Turkish primary school mathematics curriculum in terms of their grade level and content domains based on cognitive qualifications of TIMSS-2019 assessment framework. As a qualitative research design this is a case study design that uses document analysis as document collection tool. In order to classify the learning outcomes descriptive analysis is used as a qualitative data analysis technique. Considering their content domains and grade levels, the cognitive requirements of 229 phrases from first to the fourth grades are analyzed. According to the findings, of all learning outcomes about 58% are in knowing, 32% are in applying, and 10% are in reasoning domains. Comparing the grade levels, while the number of learning outcomes of knowing cognitive domain reduces from 1st through 4th, learning outcomes of reasoning cognitive domain raises from 1st through fourth which is affirmative. Results are discussed in the light of findings, and some suggestions are given.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri; Filoloji; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 1.272
Cite : 13.496
Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi