User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 48
 Downloands 14
Özel Eğitim Öğretmen Adaylarının Üstün Zekâ Kavramına Yönelik Algısı
2020
Journal:  
Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty
Author:  
Abstract:

Bu çalışmada özel eğitim öğretmen adaylarının üstün zekâ kavramına yönelik algıları incelenmiştir. Bulgular, üstün zekâ ile ilgili topluma, kültüre, zaman göre değişiklik gösterebilen kuramlar olarak sınıflandırılan örtük kuramlar temelinde değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden fenomenolojik desen ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Katılımcı grubunu 2017-2018 öğretim yılında Özel Eğitim Öğretmenliği birinci sınıf öğrencisi olan 9 kişi oluşturmaktadır. Öğrencilerin görüşleri yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme sorularıyla alınmıştır. Veriler tümevarımsal yaklaşım ile analiz edilmiştir. Verilerin analizi sonucunda beş bulguya ulaşılmıştır. Bulguların dördü araştırma sorusuna yönelik iken bir diğer bulgu ise analiz sürecinde ortaya çıkan bulgudur. Katılımcıların tamamının üstün zekâya etki eden temel faktör olarak genetiği gösterdikleri ve birçoğunun da üstün zekâyı ileri düzey bilişsel özelliklerle ilişkilendirdikleri belirlenmiştir. Katılımcıların güncel eğitim programlarının üstün zekâlılar için yeterli olmadığını düşündükleri ancak eğitimin nasıl olması gerektiği hakkında herhangi bir bilgiye sahip olmadıkları görülmüştür. Katılımcılar üstün zekâlıların sosyal özelliklerine ilişkin çoğunlukla olumsuz özellikler bildirmişlerdir. Çalışmanın ortaya çıkan bulgusu ise katılımcıların özel eğitim öğretmenliği bölümünü tercih etme nedenleri üzerinedir.

Keywords:

Introduction to the Higher Intelligence Concept of Special Education Teachers
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

Perceptions of special education preservice teachers on the concept of giftedness were revealed in this study. The findings were evaluated on the basis of the implicit theories of giftedness which are classified as theories that can represent society according to giftedness, culture and time. One of the qualitative research methods the phenomenological design was used. Participants included 9 students in the first year of Special Education Teaching Department in 2017-2018 Academic Year. The opinions of the students were collected via semi-structured interview questions. The data was analyzed by an inductive approach. Analysis of these interviews revealed five main findings. It was determined that all of the participants showed genetic factors as the main factor affecting giftedness and many of them linked giftedness with advanced cognitive characteristics. It was observed that the participants thought that the current education programs were not sufficient for gifted students but they did not have any information about how the training should be. Participants mostly negative traits regarding the social characteristics of gifted children. The emerging finding of the study is on the reasons why the participants prefer the Special Education Teaching Department

Keywords:

Special Education Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions Of Giftedness
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

Perceptions of special education preservice teachers on the concept of giftedness were revealed in this study. The findings were evaluated on the basis of the implicit theories of giftedness which are classified as theories that can represent society according to giftedness, culture and time. One of the qualitative research methods the phenomenological design was used. Participants included 9 students in the first year of Special Education Teaching Department in 2017-2018 Academic Year. The opinions of the students were collected via semi-structured interview questions. Data were analyzed by inductive approach. Analysis of these interviews revealed five main findings. It was determined that all of the participants showed genetic factors as the main factor affecting giftedness and many of them linked giftedness with advanced cognitive characteristics. It was observed that the participants thought that the current education programs were not sufficient for gifted students but they did not have any information about how the training should be. Participants reported mostly negative traits regarding the social characteristics of gifted children. The emerging finding of the study is on the reasons why the participants prefer the Special Education Teaching Department

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 251
Cite : 541
Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty