User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 15
 Views 12
 Downloands 4
SUBKLİNİK MASTİTİSLİ İNEKLERİN SÜTLERİNDEN AEROBİK BAKTERİLERİN İZOLASYONU
2012
Journal:  
Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to detect the aerobic bacteria from the cow milks with subclinical mastitis. METHODS: A total of 125 lactating dairy cows in four dairy farms were examined in terms of mastitis by clinical observations, California mastitis test (CMT), somatic cell counts (SCC) and bacteriological analysis of milk samples. CMT positive-results scored as (+1), (+2) and (+3). SCC were determined by the DeLaval cell counter® (DCC). RESULTS: There was no evidence of clinical mastitis in dairy cows examined. The CMT results of 499 quarter milk samples from 125 cows; 42 cows negative (33,6%), 83 cows positive (66,4%), 156 milk samples positive (31,3%) and 343 milk samples negative (68,7%). SCC for the milk samples which were scored as CMT (+1), (+2) and (+3), was found to be in the range of 114.120–382.100, 436.000–1.413.200 and 1.879.640–3.882.100 cell/mL, respectively. SCC for CMT negative milk samples was determined in the range of 23.500–241.200 cell/mL. As the results of the bacteriological analysis of 156 milk samples from 83 cows; while microbiological culture were positive in 117 milk samples (75%) from 58 cows (69,9%), 39 milk samples (25%) from 25 cows (30,1%) were negative. A total of 120 bacterial strains isolated from the milk samples were 48 (%41,0) Staphylococcus aureus, 20 (%17,1) coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS), 14 (%12,0) Enterobacter aerogenes, 11 (%9,4) Escherichia coli, 10 (%8,5) Streptococcus spp., 8 (%6,8) Klebsiella pneumoniae, 6 (%5,1) Citrobacter spp. and 3 (%2,6) Bacillus spp. CONCLUSION: S. aureus is the most fruquently isolated bacterium from the cow milks with subclinical mastitis.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 516
Cite : 1.819
2023 Impact : 0.067
Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi