User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 ASOS INDEKS
 Views 7
Aspect and Sentiment Classification Mechanisms of Student After-Class Self-Evaluated Comments: Investigation on Nonsense Data, Feature Extraction, and Classification Models
2023
Journal:  
Engineering Proceedings
Author:  
Abstract:

: Students’ after-class self-evaluated comments are useful for understanding students’ learning and reflecting teacher’s teaching. Researchers and engineers have attempted to apply educational data mining techniques, such as text analysis, sentiment analysis, machine learning, and deep learning to develop classification mechanisms of students’ self-evaluated comments. This study was carried out to develop aspect and sentiment classification mechanisms to automatically classify students’ self-evaluated comments into seven aspect categories and three sentiment categories. We investigated the impact of whether we should exclude nonsense data or not, the impact of different feature extraction methods, and the impact of different classification models on classification accuracy. The results showed that the combination of bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) word embedding feature extraction and Random Forest classification showed the best accuracy (90.7%) on aspect classification when including nonsense data, whereas the combination of BERT-word embedding feature extraction and Random Forest classification had the best accuracy (93.2%) on aspect classification when excluding nonsense data. Including nonsense data reduced the classification accuracies. In addition, the combination of one-word bag-of-words feature extraction and Random Forest classification presented the best accuracy (99.5%) with regard to sentiment classification.

Keywords:

0
2023
Author:  
Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Engineering Proceedings

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Engineering Proceedings