Citation Number
7
Views
47
Downloands
15
Bu araştırmanın amacı, evlilik ve boşanma deneyimi ilişkisinde dindarlık faktörünü incelemektir. Çalışmamızda nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden fenomenolojik araştırma deseni; veri toplama araçlarından yarı yapılandırılmış mülakat tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma alanını İstanbul ilinde yaşayan katılımcılar oluşturmuştur. Kadın ve erkek katılımcılardan onar kişi olmak üzere toplamda yirmi kişi ile görüşülmüştür. Araştırmada katılımcıların kişisel özellikleri, dindarlık algıları, evlilik kriterleri, boşanma nedenleri, evlilik ve dindarlık ile ilgili görüşleri de alınarak boşanmaların önlenmesinde dindarlığın etkisini tespit etmek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma sonucuna göre evlenme kriterlerinde duygusal nedenler ön planda olmakla birlikte dindarlık kriterinin etkili olduğu; boşanma nedeni olarak aldatma, ilgisizlik, iletişimsizlik, sorumsuzluk ve ekonomik nedenler ile ilgili problemlerin ilk sıralarda yer aldığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca anne ve babalarını evliliklerinde rol model olarak alan ya da karşısında ebeveynleri gibi bir eş olmasını isteyen kişilerin aile ilişkilerinde yanlış davranış ve beklentiler içerisine girdikleri; psikolojik sorunları olan bireylerin aile içi ilişkilere bu sorunları yansıttıkları görülmüştür. Boşanma deneyiminden sonra evlilik kriterlerinde duygusal nedenlerin yerini daha mantıksal nedenlerin aldığı görülmüştür. Katılımcıların çoğunluğunun yaşadığı en büyük pişmanlık, karşı tarafı iyi tanıyamadan kısa sürede evlenmeleridir. Katılımcılar, dindarlığın sadece pratikteki yönünü uygulamanın boşanmaları önleyemeyeceğini; ancak kişisel ahlakı da içerisine alan samimi bir dindarlık anlayışına sahip olunduğunda bu durumun değişebileceğini belirtmişlerdir.
The purpose of this study is to study the religious factor in the relationship between marriage and divorce experience. In our study, the phenomenological research model from the quality research methods; the semi-configured interview technique from the data collection tools was used. The study was conducted by participants living in Istanbul. A total of 20 women and men participated in the meeting. The study aimed at identifying the effects of religiousity in the prevention of divorce, taking into account the personal characteristics of participants, the perceptions of religiousity, the marriage criteria, the reasons for divorce, marriage and religiousity. According to the study, the criteria of marriage are emotional reasons in the forefront, but the criteria of religiousness is effective; the reasons for divorce are fraud, disinterest, incompatibility, irresponsibility and economic causes. In addition, those who take their parents as a model in their marriages or want to be a spouse like their parents in their family relationships are misconduct and expectations; individuals with psychological problems have been shown to reflect these problems in their family relationships. After the experience of divorce, it has been shown that emotional causes are replaced by more logical reasons in marriage criteria. The greatest regret that the majority of participants experience is that they get married shortly without knowing the other side well. Participants pointed out that the practice of religiousness can not only prevent the divorce, but that the situation can change when there is an intimate understanding of religiousness that includes personal morality.
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the religiosity factor and the process of divorce marriage experiences using a phenomenological research design from qualitative research methods. Data collection tools include a semi-structured interview technique, and the study is composed of participants living in the province of İstanbul. Twenty people were interviewed, including ten men and women from the male and female participants. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of religiousness on the prevention of divorce by taking into consideration the personal characteristics of the participants, perceptions of religiosity, marital criteria, and the reasons for divorce, marriage, and religiosity. According to the results of the research, the religiosity criterion was found to influence the emotional causes in the marriage criteria. Problems related to deception, indifference, lack of communication, irresponsibility, and economic reasons appeared in the first place as reasons for divorce. In addition, those who take their mothers and fathers as role models in their marriage, or who want to have a partner like their parents, enter into the wrong behavior and expectations in family relationships. It has been seen that individuals with psychological problems reflect these problems in family relationships. After the divorce experience, emotional reasons have been replaced by more logical reasons. The greatest regret from most of the participants is that they got married too quickly, and they did not take the time to get to know their partner. Some of the participants thought that this situation might be useful in preventing divorce. Participants say that practicing religiosity cannot prevent divorces from happening, but that may change when people have a sincere understanding of piety that incorporates personal morality
Field : İlahiyat
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Citation Owners
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
