Abstract:

Political, military and economic developments prior to the First World War have led to a global front-end, Europe-centric. Economically consolidated imperialist emotions have increased the intensity of violence from a political point of view. The polarized world on a global scale increases the war spending, which it sees as the instrument of “gravity”, while, on the other hand, civilians are rapidly militarized. The armed masses, in fact, by being sent to positions by blocked nation states or empires, which were divided into fronts in the First World War, have opened the way to a great mental and physical mobility. This situation, which is directly linked to the feelings of hatred, threatening, deepens the self-development revealed by the feeling of threatening, while the states are driven into the unity of the allies with the feeling of protection/protection. In the early days of the First World War, with the influence of violent British propaganda, Australia was caught in paranoia that it would be occupied by Germany. Because of the feeling of being threatened by Germany, Australia joined the First World War alongside Great Britain. The Australian military has served on the important fronts of the First World War, such as Chanakkale, the Western Front, Palestine, and Egypt. During World War I, 416,809 Australian soldiers were displaced, more than 60,000 Australian soldiers were killed at the end of the war, 156. About a thousand Australian soldiers were either injured or imprisoned. The four-year world war has led to a great catastrophe, a great human loss. The great catastrophe, which applies to many other states, has led to economic, political and social problems for Australia as well. In order to solve these problems, the application launched during the First World War in Australia, called the "Army Scanning Programme", has been put into force. The Australian Military Expedition Programme, in coordination with the Federal Government of Australia and the state governments, can be defined as an expedition application, based on cooperation, organizational hierarchical infrastructure regulated by laws, involving a particular group, for agriculture/animation in rural areas, for the sale or rental of state land and agricultural instruments to low-paid gases, facilitating the acquisition of private land ownership, aimed at the welfare and peace of society. Australia has implemented the program by placing displaced soldiers and their relatives within the framework of the agricultural development project, in order to replace the disruption of war-related agricultural and economic activities and to alleviate the political and social discomfort in the country. Australia has implemented its program on the basis of the model of agricultural development in the two major postwar periods with the aim of creating solutions to unemployment and relieving social unrest. In addition, the programs that gained independence after the First World War and implemented in the Middle East Europe and Canada after the war were compared to the application of the Australian military armor. The fact that Canada is both an ancient British colony, as in the example of Australia, and that it has participated with the Great Britain in the First World War, like Australia, and that both Australia and Canada have implemented the military exile policy in the same period, is one of the main reasons for comparing Australia-Canada practices. However, the study of the agricultural development programmes implemented in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, which have yet gained independence after the First World War, has made a comparison of the land and land policies that correspond to the same period in the general framework. Thus, the aim was to identify the aspects that were similar and separated to the land policies that were called and popular after the First World War as the Green Revolution. In the framework of this study, in the process in which the program was implemented in Australia (1916-1961), the land distribution to the Gaza soldiers and the military rescue program supported by financial assistance were studied. The study also included the criticism of the Australian scan program, which was politized by the political elites by making internal policy materials, and the failure of the program due to the lack of coherence between the federal and state governments, the Gazi and their families left the land and caused major environmental disasters. In the framework of the program, the scope of the displaced soldiers, the objective of the program, the historical process, the political, economic and social dimensions have been thoroughly studied.

Keywords: