Abstract:

The use of force when necessary during non-peaceful (incluing violence) meetings and demonstrations and interference with other social events is a reason for legal conformity, but the force used must be compulsory (final remedy) and proportionate in the concrete event. The hard use of the arm is the use of force in such a way that people are disabled according to the nature of the incident and the group involved. Other methods and tools that do not contain violence to be difficult to use should be unsuccessful. The hard use involves the use of weapons when physical strength, material power, various means and legal conditions occur to the extinction of the resistance encountered during the intervention and gradually to the extinction of the resistance encountered during the intervention. In order for hard use to be legitimate and legal, it must be reached to a point where all other ways have been tested before power use in the case, but there is no solution other than hard use. When hard use begins, the power used should be increased gradually. The legal and criminal responsibility of the relevant public officials in the event of difficult use or difficult use of the border is subject to the legal and criminal responsibility of the relevant public officials