User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 ASOS INDEKS
  Citation Number 2
 Views 5
Assessment of the effect of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or morphine on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesarean section
2010
Journal:  
AĞRI
Author:  
Abstract:

Objectives: Our prospective, randomized, double-blind study aimed to detect the effect of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or morphine on the postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. Methods: After approval by the hospital ethics committee and obtaining written informed consent, ASA I-II parturients undergoing elective cesarean section were enrolled in this study. None of the patients had any contraindication for spinal anesthesia or sensitivity to local anesthetics. Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blinded fashion to receive either intrathecal 10 mg 5% levobupivacaine + 0.1 mg morphine (Group M, n=30) or 10 mg 5% levobupivacaine + 20 mcg fentanyl (Group F, n=30). The onset of sensorial block and anesthesia, interval of effective analgesia until the first analgesic requirement, disappearance of motor block according to modified Bromage scale, duration of spinal analgesia, additional analgesic requirement, amount of additional analgesic, adverse effects, and postoperative patient satisfaction were recorded. Results: The additional analgesic requirement period was significantly longer in Group M than Group F (p<0.001). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were significantly higher in Group F than Group M (p<0.05). Intended, delivered and total analgesic amount values were significantly higher in Group F than Group M (p<0.001). Patient satisfaction and presentation elsewhere were significantly higher in Group M than Group F (p<0.01). Conclusion: Despite more adverse effects, additional analgesic requirement is lower in Group M, and the long-term painless postoperative period accounts for the choice by mothers.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








AĞRI

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 171
Cite : 5
AĞRI