Özet:

This article follows the change in the historical process of the Sih religion that occurred in the 15th century in the Indian region of Pencap. Our study aims to reveal what points the origins of some fundamentalist formations that act for religious reasons in the modern era have been referred to in the history of Sih. The Sih tradition, built by Guru Nanak on the stages of peace and peace, has lived a passive life for a hundred years. However, some internal and external reasons have forced the Seychelles to be armed. The Sikh society, economically strengthened, used this power in the throne struggles of the Babur Empire. With the support of Guru Arjan's Hüsrev who rebelled against Cihangir Shah, the Sihler began to play a role in the political arena. Guru Har Rai used his military power on the side of Dara Shukuh, who rebelled against Evrengzib. Again, Teg Bahadur, who was arrested by the Baburlians, was convicted of rebellion and murdered. The Sih society, which has become increasingly active from Guru Arjan, has reached the threshold of transformation with the murder of Teg Bahadur. The Guru Gobind Singh, who followed Teg Bahadur, made the Sih community a military structure, and founded the Khalsa Organization. Gobind has formed a Sih society that deals with his appearance of faith and can defend itself against persecution. The events that occurred in the process between Arjan and Gobind have been the main foundation points of modern fundamentalist movements. However, the fundamentalist’s direction to violence occurred in the subsequent process. In the period of the Gourdes, the struggles of the Sihans are often in the nature of self-defense. The Sikhers had a good relationship with the British who ruled the region after the Babur Empire. During this time, he served in British military stages. But the relations with the British, especially due to the issue of the administration of the Sih temples, were broken. The discussions on the issue of the administration of temples opened the way to the process of the Amritsar Massacre in 1919. After the Amritsar massacre, the Sihler began to seek political solutions with the Sih Society they found in 1920, and they fought for the national-state ideal, which was the widespread fury of the time. The Akali Dal party and the British parliament in India. But in 1947 after Britain left the region, the establishment of the states of India and Pakistan, and the division of Pencap, disturbed the Shihs. The Sihler, who sought their rights from political ways, published the Anandpur Proprietary proposal in 1973. But when the political attempts did not result, the violence in the Sikh society took action. Since the 1970s, the fundamentalist Sihler has committed many violent acts. The most famous of these events is that the Fundamentalist leader Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, along with his supporters, turns Harmandir Sahib into a magnificent castle. Although the government of India has ended the fundamentalist movement by carrying out the Blue Star Operation, it has shut down the fate of a larger event. After the operation, Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was killed by his own Shi Guards, and therefore anti-Shi rebellions arose. Over the course of the four-day rebellion, 2,800 Sih were killed. The Sih tradition, which Nanak built on the principles of peace and peace, has changed as it is transmitted to political events and has eventually become unexpected. The historical process is an important example for mankind. This example shows that the principle of peace and peace that only one side is pushing is not sufficient. Those who are trying to return to the basic doctrines of the Faith, the Faith fundamentals, who are willing to reach peace and peace through violence, are clearly contradicted with themselves. Nowadays, even if the Sih fundamentalists are based on religion, it is not right to interpret these events as religious fundamentalism. Because in these events, religious reasons are used as a tool on the way to the political goal. Thus, the events of the Sih fundamentalist will be able to describe as political fundamentalism.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Anahtar Kelimeler: