Yapay zekâ (YZ); sanat ve tasarım gibi yaratıcılık gerektiren alanlarda özerk üretim yapabilmektedir. Ancak özerkliği hukuken tanınmadığı için, üretimler YZ’ya tescil edilememektedir. Çalışma; YZ ile üretilen görsel sanat eserlerinin, fikrî mülkiyet paylaşım usullerini belirlemek amacıyla hazırlanmıştır. Derleme türündeki çalışmada; nitel araştırma veri toplama tekniklerinden doküman incelemesi kullanılmıştır. Farklı yargı bölgelerinin konuya yaklaşımları, hukuki ve felsefi doktrinler, uygulamaya dönük düzenlemeler incelenmiştir. Mevcut yasal rejimlerde telif koşullarını açıklayan araştırmalardan faydalanılmıştır. Literatür incelemesi neticesinde; yasaların, teknolojik gelişmeleri değerlendirebilecek içeriğe sahip olmadığı yönünde görüşler tespit edilmiştir. Gelecekte YZ’ya atanabilecek kişilik statüleri ve bu statülerle üretilecek eserlerin mülkiyetine ilişkin tavsiyeler sunulmuştur. Avrupa Parlamentosu’nun 2017 yılında önerdiği elektronik kişilik statüsünün, yakın gelecekte yürürlüğe gireceği ve YZ’nın telif hakları için makul çözümler sağlayacağı öngörülmektedir.
Artificial intelligence (YZ) can produce self-production in areas that require creativity such as art and design. However, since the autonomy is not recognized by law, the production cannot be registered in the YZ. The study was prepared to determine the procedures for the sharing of visual art works produced by YZ, intellectual property. In the study of the type of editing; quality research data collection techniques used document examination. Approaches to the subject of the different jurisdictions, the legal and philosophical doctrines, the practical arrangements have been studied. The research has been benefited by the research that explains the copyright conditions in existing legal regimes. The literature study found that the laws have no content to evaluate technological developments. The personality statutes that may be assigned to YZ in the future and the ownership of the works that will be produced with these statutes have been presented. The status of electronic personality proposed by the European Parliament in 2017 is expected to enter into force in the near future and to provide reasonable solutions for copyright.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is capable of autonomous production in areas which require creativity such as art and design. However, the products cannot be registered to AI as its autonomy is not legally recognized. This study aims to determine the intellectual property sharing methods of visual art works produced by AI. In this study of compilation, document analysis as one of the qualitative research data collection techniques is used. Approaches of different jurisdictions to the issue, legal and philosophical doctrines, and practical regulations are examined. Researches explaining the copyright conditions in contemporary legal regimes are used. As a result of the literature review, the assessments that the laws do not yet have the content to evaluate technological developments are observed. The personality statuses that can be assigned to artificial intelligence in the future and recommendations regarding the copyright of the works to be produced with these statuses are presented. It is predicted that the electronic personality status proposed by the European Parliament in 2017 will come into effect in the near future and provide reasonable solutions related to the copyright of AI.
Alan : Güzel Sanatlar; Mimarlık, Planlama ve Tasarım
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|