User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 23
 Downloands 1
Development of a multi­criteria model for making decisions on the location of solid waste landfills
2018
Journal:  
Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies
Author:  
Abstract:

We have developed a structure of the multi-criteria model of decision making related to determine optimal sites for the location of solid waste landfills (using the south of Odessa oblast as an example). A special feature of the model is the integration of GIS and the multi-criteria methods of decision-making. Based on the created raster criteria maps in the GIS geodatabase and expert estimation of the significance of criteria, we ranked alternatives according to the degree of suitability. A multilevel hierarchical decision-making structure includes three groups of criteria: environmental, physical, and socio-economic; it takes into consideration the state building requirements to the construction of SW polygons. Such an approach provides for the acceptability of results of the analysis by most stakeholders. The simulation is performed for the three scenarios that imply the aggregation of layers of criteria into a combined map of suitability using Boolean logic, fuzzy logic, and a combination of methods of weighted overlay and a fuzzy analysis of hierarchies. To account for the uncertainty of original information and subjectivity in expert assessments, we employed an apparatus of fuzzy logic. Piecewise-linear membership functions of the fuzzy set are proposed for the standardization of criteria. We calculated weights of criteria using a modified method of the analysis of hierarchies, in which we used linguistic variables represented by triangular fuzzy numbers to perform the paired comparison of criteria significance. The results of the simulation show that the use of operations of a fuzzy intersection or a fuzzy combination in order to aggregate a combined suitability map can lead to errors related to the underestimation or overestimation of alternatives. The most acceptable method is a weighted linear combination, or the operation of fuzzy geometric averaging, in cases when it is difficult or impossible to determine the weight of criteria. Author Biographies Svitlana Kuznichenko, Odessa State Environmental University Lvivska str., 15, Odessa, Ukraine, 65016 PhD, Associate Professor Department of information technology

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies

Field :   Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 4.764
Cite : 4.485
2023 Impact : 0.294
Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies