Özet:

Abstract In the pursuit of consolidating their authority and promoting their political doctrines, politicians harness the power of discourse. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) serves as a vital instrument for scrutinizing and critiquing the intricate interplay between discourse and power. Within the framework of CDA theories, this study embarks on an exploration of the discursive and argumentative tactics employed by two prominent Turkish presidents, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk and Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Employing a comparative approach, the research aims to underscore the ideological disparities manifested in their language use, drawing upon the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). The application of the Discourse-Historical Approach brings to light a spectrum of strategies, including the Shift of Blame, Legitimation, and Discontinuation strategies. The results gleaned from this investigation shed light on the pervasive presence of ideology and power at various discernible linguistic and structural levels within the realm of political speeches. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how discourse is wielded as a tool for political influence and ideological dissemination.

Anahtar Kelimeler: