Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
  Atıf Sayısı 5
 Görüntüleme 9
 İndirme 1
GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ TIP FAKÜLTESİ 2. SINIF ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN ANATOMİ EĞİTİMİNİ DEĞERLENDİRMELERİ
2006
Dergi:  
Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası
Yazar:  
Özet:

Aim: This study was designed as Phase II students’ evaluation of Anatomy teaching at Gazi University Medical School at the end of academic year 2004-2005. Methods: The questionnaire was asked to be filled by the Phase II students in a classroom under the surveillance of instructors. 180 (80.0%) out of 225 students took part. The questionnaire was in the form of Likert scale (i.e. absolutely agree, partly agree, no idea, partly disagree, absolutely disagree), and analyzed in SPSS for Windows statistical program. Findings: Of those 180 students who took part, 78.9% attended 70% of the lecture hours at the minimum, and following percentages were found as the results of combined answers of items “absolutely agree” and “partly agree”. 66.1% of the students found the aim and structure of the lectures well planned, 58.9% thought the way in which the lectures delivered made understanding easier, 62.2% stated that the important points were underlined during the lectures, 61.6% were in good communication with the tutors, 61.7% were generally satisfied with the lectures. 93.9% of the students, who participated, attended 80% of the practical sessions at the minimum. 87.2% thought the lectures and practical sessions were accordance, 60.5% stated that the sessions what was expected, 73.3% thought that the session duration was satisfactory, according to 29.5% number of cadavers were sufficient, this ratio was 38.9% for the number of models, and 40% found variety of models satisfactory, 72.2% claimed no problem with the sessions. As for the exams, 80% found exams well planned, and for 61.7% questions were clear and easy to understand. Conclusion: For to improve and open new horizons in Medical education, students’ evaluations and feedbacks are important and due attention will be given and open to discussion in the Departmental Education Meeting.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

The University of GAZI II. Students’ Anatomy Education Assessment
2006
Yazar:  
Özet:

Aim: This study was designed as Phase II students' evaluation of Anatomy teaching at Gazi University Medical School at the end of academic year 2004-2005. Methods: The questionnaire was asked to be filled by the Phase II students in a classroom under the surveillance of instructors. 180 (80.0%) out of 225 students took part. The questionnaire was in the form of Likert scale (i.e. absolutely agree, partly agree, no idea, partly disagree, absolutely disagree), and analyzed in SPSS for Windows statistical program. Findings: Of those 180 students who took part, 78.9% attended 70% of the lecture hours at the minimum, and following percentages were found as the results of combined answers of items "absolutely agree" and "partly agree". 66. 1% of the students found the aim and structure of the lectures well planned, 58.9% thought the way in which the lectures delivered made understanding easier, 62.2% stated that the important points were underlined during the lectures, 61.6% were in good communication with the tutors, 61.7% were generally satisfied with the lectures. 93.9% of the students, who participated, attended 80% of the practical sessions at the minimum. 87.2% thought the lectures and practical sessions were accordance, 60.5% stated that the sessions what was expected, 73.3% thought that the session duration was satisfactory, according to 29.5% number of cadavers were sufficient, this ratio was 38.9% for the number of models, and 40% found variety of models satisfactory, 72.2% claimed no problem with the sessions. As for the exams, 80% found exams well planned, and for 61.7% questions were clear and easy to understand. Conclusion: For to improve and open new horizons in Medical education, students’ evaluations and feedback are important and due attention will be given and open to discussion in the Departmental Education Meeting.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Dikkat!
Yayınların atıflarını görmek için Sobiad'a Üye Bir Üniversite Ağından erişim sağlamalısınız. Kurumuzun Sobiad'a üye olması için Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı ile iletişim kurabilirsiniz.
Kampüs Dışı Erişim
Eğer Sobiad Abonesi bir kuruma bağlıysanız kurum dışı erişim için Giriş Yap Panelini kullanabilirsiniz. Kurumsal E-Mail adresiniz ile kolayca üye olup giriş yapabilirsiniz.
Benzer Makaleler








Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası

Alan :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Dergi Türü :   Ulusal

Metrikler
Makale : 473
Atıf : 1.106
2023 Impact/Etki : 0.067
Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası