User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 5
 Views 9
 Downloands 1
GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ TIP FAKÜLTESİ 2. SINIF ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN ANATOMİ EĞİTİMİNİ DEĞERLENDİRMELERİ
2006
Journal:  
Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası
Author:  
Abstract:

Aim: This study was designed as Phase II students’ evaluation of Anatomy teaching at Gazi University Medical School at the end of academic year 2004-2005. Methods: The questionnaire was asked to be filled by the Phase II students in a classroom under the surveillance of instructors. 180 (80.0%) out of 225 students took part. The questionnaire was in the form of Likert scale (i.e. absolutely agree, partly agree, no idea, partly disagree, absolutely disagree), and analyzed in SPSS for Windows statistical program. Findings: Of those 180 students who took part, 78.9% attended 70% of the lecture hours at the minimum, and following percentages were found as the results of combined answers of items “absolutely agree” and “partly agree”. 66.1% of the students found the aim and structure of the lectures well planned, 58.9% thought the way in which the lectures delivered made understanding easier, 62.2% stated that the important points were underlined during the lectures, 61.6% were in good communication with the tutors, 61.7% were generally satisfied with the lectures. 93.9% of the students, who participated, attended 80% of the practical sessions at the minimum. 87.2% thought the lectures and practical sessions were accordance, 60.5% stated that the sessions what was expected, 73.3% thought that the session duration was satisfactory, according to 29.5% number of cadavers were sufficient, this ratio was 38.9% for the number of models, and 40% found variety of models satisfactory, 72.2% claimed no problem with the sessions. As for the exams, 80% found exams well planned, and for 61.7% questions were clear and easy to understand. Conclusion: For to improve and open new horizons in Medical education, students’ evaluations and feedbacks are important and due attention will be given and open to discussion in the Departmental Education Meeting.

Keywords:

The University of GAZI II. Students’ Anatomy Education Assessment
2006
Author:  
Abstract:

Aim: This study was designed as Phase II students' evaluation of Anatomy teaching at Gazi University Medical School at the end of academic year 2004-2005. Methods: The questionnaire was asked to be filled by the Phase II students in a classroom under the surveillance of instructors. 180 (80.0%) out of 225 students took part. The questionnaire was in the form of Likert scale (i.e. absolutely agree, partly agree, no idea, partly disagree, absolutely disagree), and analyzed in SPSS for Windows statistical program. Findings: Of those 180 students who took part, 78.9% attended 70% of the lecture hours at the minimum, and following percentages were found as the results of combined answers of items "absolutely agree" and "partly agree". 66. 1% of the students found the aim and structure of the lectures well planned, 58.9% thought the way in which the lectures delivered made understanding easier, 62.2% stated that the important points were underlined during the lectures, 61.6% were in good communication with the tutors, 61.7% were generally satisfied with the lectures. 93.9% of the students, who participated, attended 80% of the practical sessions at the minimum. 87.2% thought the lectures and practical sessions were accordance, 60.5% stated that the sessions what was expected, 73.3% thought that the session duration was satisfactory, according to 29.5% number of cadavers were sufficient, this ratio was 38.9% for the number of models, and 40% found variety of models satisfactory, 72.2% claimed no problem with the sessions. As for the exams, 80% found exams well planned, and for 61.7% questions were clear and easy to understand. Conclusion: For to improve and open new horizons in Medical education, students’ evaluations and feedback are important and due attention will be given and open to discussion in the Departmental Education Meeting.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 473
Cite : 1.112
2023 Impact : 0.067
Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası