Abstract:

The point where Bourdieu’s sociology and the methodologies of other sociologists are separated is Bourdieu’s questioning the accepted generalizations and the effort to combine the contradictions in this context. The classical sociologists, who put the foundation of sociology science and the concepts they presented, have set up a foundation for sociology science until today. This has brought some contradictions with him. Another distinction in Bourdieu methodology is the effort and efforts to overcome these contradictions. Bourdieu's conceptual development is situated in the use of habitus, capital and field concepts, metatouristic principles and a broad perspective. In the context of relational thinking, Bourdieu tried to understand the idea of social integration and the topic of rationalization primarily, the social reality as a whole. Bourdieu, based on the assumption that each concept and theory can be interpretable according to the facts and events studied, brought a critical perspective on the dualities between the concepts. Bourdieu’s important way of expression in the perspective of these concepts is the reflexive expression. Reflexive with Bourdieu aims to establish twisted circular relationships between cause and result. In this context, in social sciences, on the thought background, it is about an effort to understand by a social action that transformally affects the factors that trigger itself. With this study, these perspectives were attempted to reflect the field, habitus and capital concepts that Bourdieu thought much about in the perspective.

Keywords: