Abstract:

The aim of this study is to study the relationship between childhood trauma, cognitive emotional regulation skills and levels of aggression of university students. In this study, a relational scan model was used. The university of this research is the university students who are studying in İzmir in the 2018-2019 educational year. The sample of searching is 9 September University, Yaşar University and İzmir Economics University students with the method of layering. This universe has created a sample of 505 students studying in different faculties, different departments. The age range of the sample group created by the layering method is 18 and 30. 42.6 percent are women and 57.4 percent are men. In the study, personal information form with the Childhood Race Dimension (C.C. The dimension of cognitive emotional regulation (B.D.D.The measurement of aggression was used. Demographic characteristics have been illustrated and frequency and percentage distribution have been removed. In relation to measurements, ss, the values have been determined. Correlation analysis was also performed to determine the interscale relationship, regression analysis to identify the relative effect. The level of significance is p<,05. The results obtained in the research are these. The childhood trauma scale and the scale of cognitive emotional regulation have been shown to have a negative meaningful relationship, and the scale of aggression has a positive meaningful relationship. As trauma scores increase, cognitive emotional regulation scores decrease, aggressiveness scores increase. There is a positive relationship between the emotional organization and the aggressiveness. According to the standardized regression rate (β), the relative importance of the subjective variables over aggression is: emotional abuse, physical negligence, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional negligence. When the t test results on the significance of the regression ratings were studied, the subdimensions of emotional abuse and physical negligence were shown to be an important (sensitive) contributor to aggression. There is a relationship with emotional abuse in a positive direction with physical neglect in a negative direction. According to the standardized regression rate (β), the relative importance of the subjective variables over aggression is: physical abuse, physical negligence, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, emotional negligence. When the t test results on the significance of the regression ratings were studied, it was found that physical abuse, physical negligence, emotional negligence and subdimensions of sexual abuse were an important (significant) contributor to the emotional arrangement. All variables have a positive relationship.