Özet:

This study was carried out with the aim of identifying the risks that may occur in schools and improving the scale of evaluation of school risks in order to prevent more potential disadvantages and better manage schools. In the course of the development of the scale, a risk pool was created based on the answers from open end questions that were first scaned in literature and prepared in accordance with the purpose. The risks in the created risk (material) are classified as internal and external risks according to literature. Substances that are similar and inappropriate in the first scale draft containing 87 risk statements have been removed on the basis of the expert opinion and the number of substances has been reduced to 69. These risks have been classified according to the five-type likert and have been carried out by 15 school directors, 52 assistant directors and 487 teachers who work in 30 different secondary education institutions located in the province of Niğde and districts with a total of 554 people. The KMO value was 0.952. According to the factor analysis, 47 scale substances are aggregated in 5 factors, which describe 50.3% of the scale’s total variance. The material load in the final state of the formed scale is between 0.75 and 0.55. The five-factor scale Cronbach Alfa reliability ratio is 0.948 of 47 elements. This is highly reliable. According to the results of the substance analysis based on the average of the sub-top group, the differentiability of all scale substances is significant (p<,005). School Risk Assessment Scale was tested using verifying factor analysis (DFA) where the five-factor structure discovered by the distorting factor analysis. The results of the analysis show that the model is statistically meaningful and that the model’s conformity well-being values meet the conformity criteria. This scale development work is expected to contribute to the work that will be done in order to effectively manage the schools.

Anahtar Kelimeler: