User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 53
 Downloands 24
YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE BAĞIL VE MUTLAK DEĞERLENDİRMEYE İLİŞKİN ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARININ GÖRÜŞLERİ
2017
Journal:  
Asos Journal
Author:  
Abstract:

Araştırmanın genel amacı, “Yükseköğretimde bağıl ve mutlak değerlendirmeye ilişkin öğretim elemanlarının görüşleri” nin belirlenmesidir. Araştırmada, tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini ise Fırat Üniversitesi’ndeki Eğitim Fakültesi 32 (%43), Teknik Eğitim Fakültesi 35 (%95) ve Mühendislik Fakültesi’nde 30 (%53) olmak üzere toplam 97 (%33) öğretim elemanı oluşturmuştur. Bağıl değerlendirmede öğrencilerin arasında rekabetin arttığı belirlenmiştir. Bilgi düzeyleri aynı olmasına rağmen, bağıl değerlendirme sisteminde değerlendirilen öğrencilerin notları, mutlak değerlendirme sisteminde değerlendirilen öğrencilere göre daha yüksektir fikri ön plana çıkmaktadır. Araştırmada elde edilen bir diğer sonuç ise öğretim elemanlarının bağıl ve mutlak değerlendirmenin karma olarak uygulanması görüşüne ilişkindir. Eğitim ve mühendislik fakültelerinde görev yapan öğretim elemanları bu görüşe olumlu bakmışken, teknik eğitim fakültesinde görev yapan öğretim elemanları bu görüşe olumsuz baktıkları belirlenmiştir.

Keywords:

Relationship with Higher Education Relationship with Higher Education Relationship
2017
Journal:  
Asos Journal
Author:  
Abstract:

The general purpose of the study is to determine "the opinions of teachers on the reliable and absolute assessment in higher education". In the research, the screening model was used. The sample of the study was made by a total of 97 (33%) teachers, including the Faculty of Education at the University of Fırat 32 (43%), the Faculty of Technical Education 35 (95) and the Faculty of Engineering 30 (53%). The competition between students has increased. Although the level of knowledge is the same, the idea is that the scores of students assessed in the connective assessment system are higher than the students assessed in the absolute assessment system. Another outcome from the study is the view of the teaching members to apply the reliable and absolute assessment as a karma. While the teachers who work in the educational and engineering faculty looked positively on this view, the teachers who work in the technical education faculty were determined to look negatively on this view.

Keywords:

The Opinions About Relative and Absolute Assessment Of The Teaching Staff In The Higher Education
2017
Journal:  
Asos Journal
Author:  
Abstract:

The aim of the study , "The opinions about relative and absolute assessment of the teaching staff in the higher education" is determined. In this study, screening model was used. The research sample of the Faculty of Education 32 (43%), Faculty of Technical Education 35 (95%) and the Faculty of Engineering 30 (53%) including 97 (33%) consisted of the instructor. Relative assessment it was determined that increased competition among students. Although the same level of knowledge, the relative evaluation system evaluated in the students' grades, students assessed in absolute evaluation system is higher than the idea is come to the fore. A further result obtained in the study of the teaching staff on the implementation of the relative and absolute assessment is mixed. Training and teaching staff working in the engineering faculties positive looked up this opinion, the technical training school instructors who work in it was determined that this opinion looked negatively.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles








Asos Journal

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri; Filoloji; Güzel Sanatlar; Hukuk; İlahiyat; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler; Spor Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 5.146
Cite : 9.739
2023 Impact : 0.075
Asos Journal