Abstract:

Tatars, has a well-established tradition of oral expression. However, written language in Tatars started to consist of in the fifteenth century, but books began to be written in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Works have given in Tatar literature at the eighteenth century and the nineteenth century, but these periods are not very efficient. Türkîcilik ruled in language up to half of 19th century. Then, Türkiçilik-Tatarçılık discussion started in the region with respect to the writing language. Rızaeddin Fahreddin has been defender and practitioner of the idea Türkîçilik from Türkîçilik- Tatarcılık ideas. Rızaeddin Fahreddin has opposed localization and liquidationism in language in the course of a discussion of Tatar language. İn this respect Rızaeddin Fahreddin’s literary works needs to be examined. Rızaeddin Fahreddin lived seventy-seven years and left behind many historical, biographical, pedagogical works. There are Rızaeddin Fahreddin’s two literary works named Esma yaki Amel ve Ceza and Selime yaki İffet. First, Rızaeddin Fahreddin’s these two literary works were written in the Arabic alphabet and with Ottoman spelling, then transcribed in Cyrillic and re-published. However, there are differences between the two editions. For example, there is no in Arabic script used for the text suffixes in Cyrillic texts. İnstead of thees, there are suffixes of today’s Tatar-Bashkir language. In this study, will be examined the names, name, type, name suffixes of Fahreddin'in Rızaeddin’ literary works. Names give clues about the author's style with usage, in terms of the meanings to them and their income suffixes in works. Names play an active role in directly to the author's style. Therefore, in this article Rızaeddin Fahreddin’s literary works are examined in terms of the author uses the names and the suffixes of the names of the works.

Keywords: