Görüntüleme
35
İndirme
17
Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV); birbirini etkileyebilen kriterlere göre karar seçenekleri arasından en uygun olan alternatifi belirleme süreci olarak tanımlanmaktadır. ÇKKV yöntemlerinin birçok kriteri dikkate almasından dolayı Türkiye’deki illerin yaşanabilirlik sıralamasını belirlemede en uygun tekniklerden bir tanesi olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Bu çalışma ile Türkiye’deki iller, yaşanılabilirlik kriterlerine göre EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) ve WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) yöntemlerine göre sıralanmıştır. İllerin yaşanabilirlik kriterlerine göre sıralanmasında altyapı hizmetlerine erişim, çalışma hayatı çevre, eğitim, gelir ve servet, güvenlik, konut, sağlık, sivil katılım, sosyal yaşam ve yaşam memnuniyeti kriterleri kullanılmıştır. İllerin sıralanmasında TÜİK’in 2015 yılında yayımlamış olduğu Türkiye’deki İllerde Yaşam Endeksi verileri kullanılmış ve bulgular bu endeks ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Yaşanabilirlik noktasında sıralamaların üst seviyelerinde yer alan illerin Türkiye’nin Batı, alt sıralarda yer alan illerin ise Güneydoğu ve Doğu bölgelerinde yer aldığı görülmüştür.
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is defined as the process by which the most suitable one of the decision alternatives is determined. Taking various criteria into consideration, MCDM techniques seem to be among the most suitable in the determination of the livability ranking of the provinces in Turkey. This study aims to rank the provinces in Turkey according to the livability criteria by EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) and WASPAS (Aggregated Weighted Sum-Product Assessment). Access to infrastructure services, civil participation, education, environment, health, housing, income and wealth, life satisfaction, security, social life, and working life criteria were taken into consideration in the ranking process of the provinces in Turkey by livability. In the ranking of provinces, the living index data related to the provinces in Turkey issued by TURKSTAT (Turkish Statistical Institute) in 2015 were used, and the findings were compared with the indices. The results show that the provinces located in western Turkey are at the top while those located in the east and southeast are at the bottom.
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) be defined as the process by which the most suitable one of the decision alternatives is determined. Taking various criteria into consideration, MCDM techniques seem to be among the most suitable in the determination of the livability ranking of the provinces in Turkey. This study aims to rank the provinces in Turkey according to the livability criteria by EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) and WASPAS (Aggregated Weighted Sum-Product Assessment). Access to infrastructure services, civic participation, education, environment, health, housing, income and wealth, life satisfaction, security, social life, and working life criteria were taken into consideration in the ranking process of the provinces in Turkey by livability. In the ranking of provinces, the living index data related to the provinces in Turkey issued by TURKSTAT (Turkish Statistical Institute) in 2015 were used, and the findings were compared with the indices. The results show that the provinces located in western Turkey are at the top while those located in the east and southeast are at the bottom.
Alan : Eğitim Bilimleri; Filoloji; Güzel Sanatlar; Hukuk; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Makale Detay 
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Alıntı Yap
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
