Bu çalışma, dijitalleşmeyle birlikte her geçen gün dönüşmeye devam eden gazetecilik pratikleri ve mesleğin aldığı yeni biçim doğrultusunda beliren yeni etik sorunları ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Dijitalleşmenin etkisinin kapsamını ve şiddetini tespit edebilmek için gazetecilikte dijitalleşme pratiğinin ilk elden deneyimleyicisi olan internet editörlerinin görüşlerine başvurulmuştur. Bu kapsamda 15-20 Ocak 2018 tarihlerinde İstanbul’da Hürriyet, Milliyet, Sabah gazetelerinde görev yapmakta olan internet editörleri ile görüşülmüştür. Çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak Patton’un “görüşme formu tekniği”ne başvurulmuş, elde edilen verilere içerik analizi uygulanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre gazeteciler, dijitalleşmenin gazetecilikte haber üretim sürecine olumlu ve olumsuz etkileri olduğunu düşünmektedir. Gazeteciler, haberler dolayımıyla hem habercilik hem de okur açısından geleneksel basında daha önce karşılaşılmayan yeni etik sorunların ortaya çıktığını da düşünmektedir. Bunlar arasında yeni gazetecilikte artık editörün “masabaşı muhabir” rolünü üstlenmesi, “tık odaklı bir gazetecilik pratiğinin yaygınlaşması”, “haber kaynağı ve habere erişimin şartlarının değişmesi”, “hataların ve gerçekdışı haberlerin hızla yayılması”, “hız tuzağı” ve “sanal galeriler” öne çıkmaktadır.
The aim of this study was to investigate the rapid changes in journalistic practice occurring along with digitalization and the new ethical problems emerging as a result of this new form of the profession. In order to assess the scope and intensity of the effect of digitalization, the views were sought of the internet editors themselves, who have the primary direct experience of the practice of digitalization. Therefore, the internet editors of Hürriyet, Milliyet and Sabah newspapers were interviewed in Istanbul between 15 and 20 January 2018. Patton's interview form technique was used as a data gathering instrument, and content analysis was applied to the data gathered. According to the results of the study, journalists thought that digitalization had both positive and negative effects on the news production process in journalism. They also thought that new, ethical problems in the transmission of news, previously unencountered in the traditional press, had arisen both for journalism and for readers. Foremost among these were the editor taking the role of a desk-based reporter in the new journalism, the spread of click-focused journalistic practice, news sources and changes in the conditions of accessing news, the rapid spread of mistakes and fake news, the click trap, and virtual galleries.
The aim of this study was to investigate the rapid changes in journalistic practice occurring along with digitalization and the new ethical problems emerging as a result of this new shape of the profession. In order to assess the scope and intensity of the effect of digitalization, the views were sought of the internet editors themselves, who have the primary direct experience of the practice of digitalization. Therefore, the internet editors of Hürriyet, Milliyet and Sabah newspapers were interviewed in İstanbul between 15 and 20 January 2018. Patton’s interview form technique was used as a data gathering instrument, and content analysis was applied to the data gathered. According to the results of the study, journalists thought that digitalization had both positive and negative effects on the news production process in journalism. They also thought that new, ethical problems in the transmission of news, previously unencountered in the traditional press, had arisen both for journalism and for readers. Foremost among these were the editor taking the role of a desk-based reporter in the new journalism, the spread of click-focused journalistic practice, news sources and changes in the conditions of accessing news, the rapid spread of mistakes and fake news, the click trap, and virtual galleries.
Alan : Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|