User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 1
 Views 60
 Downloands 31
Toplumsal Yetenek Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması
2008
Journal:  
Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of The Social Ability Questionnaire developed by Yang et al, (2006) in a group of Turkish college students. The original questionnaire was in English and had five factors, 30 items. First of all, the original questionnaire was translated into Turkish, and obtained experts’ critics in terms of language, content, measurement and evaluation etc. Afterwards, both the English and Turkish forms were administered to a group of M.E.T.U. students (n=28) in a period of two week to determine the equivalency of these two forms. Finally, the Turkish version was administered group of university students (n=160) who have experienced online learning. Like the original form, the results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the Turkish version had five factors and consisted of 27 items. The Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency coefficient was also computed as .86

Keywords:

the current and reliability of the social talent scale
2008
Author:  
Abstract:

the purpose of this study was to determine the criteria of language content measurement and assessment by yang et al 2006 in a group of turkish college students the original diploma was in english and had five factors 30 items first of all the original diploma was translated into turkish and asked experts’ critics in terms of language content measurement and assessment etc. both the english and turkish forms were evaluated by group of students n28 in a period of two weeks to determine the equivalency of these two forms were finally the turkish version was determined by the group of the international version of the nationality of the list of the group of the nationality of the list of the national language of the russian and turkish language content of the russian and turkish language content of the russian language content of the russian and turkish language content and turkish language content of the russian and turkish and turkish language content were among five languages

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles
Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 880
Cite : 9.303
2023 Impact : 0.596
Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi