Özet:

In this study; the evaluation of the views related to methods of training and assigning school administrators of union representatives, education inspectors and school administrators are examined. The study group of the survey is composed of the views of 10 union representatives, 10 school administrators and 11 education inspectors who are chosen with the method of convenience sampling from purposeful sampling methods, who are in Malaysia in 2014-2015 school year. The aim of this study is making suggestion about how the levels of choosing, training and developing school administrators should be formed, based on opinions of union representatives, education inspectors and school administrators in Malaysia. It is aimed to find out some suggestions about school administrators' being chosen, trained and developed with the best and objective criteria, which is one of the biggest factors of improving the quality of education, at the end of this study. Consequently, school administrators do not take executive training before service and in fact, even after coming into office, they do not take necessary in-service training sufficiently, sometimes due to personal reasons and sometimes due to institutional reasons. However, school administration requires having much more different skills besides the skills that a teacher should have. It cannot be expected from school administrators to master relevant legislation only with the experience gained in time, as well as different subjects such as school management, supervision, evaluation, leadership, effective communication, personnel management and budget management. Most of the participants who took place the study had criticised the current applications of the assigning school administrators regulation

Anahtar Kelimeler: